2012 Second International Conference on 3D Imaging, Modeling, Processing, Visualization &Amp; Transmission 2012
DOI: 10.1109/3dimpvt.2012.71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non Local Point Set Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the supplementary material we include an application that improves an NLM-like algorithm for denoising and interpolation of 3D point clouds [8]. In this case a data structure is definitely required to index and query a set of patches even for point cloud of 10 6 points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the supplementary material we include an application that improves an NLM-like algorithm for denoising and interpolation of 3D point clouds [8]. In this case a data structure is definitely required to index and query a set of patches even for point cloud of 10 6 points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a point set compression framework, [DCV14] proposes a descriptor from which the surface can be locally re‐sampled, based on a local surface height map. Following the success of the non‐local means in image processing [BCM05], similarity‐based denoising has been proposed for surface meshes [YBS06] and point clouds [Dig12, GAB12]. Our method borrows the non‐local processing idea from this thread of work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works in image processing [BCM05] attempt to tackle this problem, by introducing the notion of non-local means (NLM). [Dig12] and [GAB12] proposed to exploit the surface self-similarity for surface denoising and meshless geometry processing respectively. Barnes et al [BSFG09] presented an interactive image editing tool by using a randomized algorithm to find similar image patches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%