Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: Good practice guidelines

Riera, Pere; Signorello, Giovanni; Thiene, Mara; Mahieu, Pierre Alexandre; Navrud, Ståle; Kaval, Pamela; Rulleau, Bénédicte; Mavsar, Robert; Madureira, Lívia; Meyerhoff, Jürgen; Elsasser, Peter; Notaro, Sandra; Salvo, Maria De; Giergiczny, Marek; Dragoi, Simona

doi:10.1016/j.jfe.2012.07.001

Cited by 68 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These methods can be divided into two main groups: contingent valuation and choice modelling techniques. Contingent valuation surveys ask participants their 'willingness to act' or 'willingness to pay' for changes, whereas choice modelling surveys present participants with several alternatives and elicit preference values from them (Riera et al 2012). Surveys are typically designed so that the answers to the questions can be designed as a choice experiment, contingent ranking, rating or grouping (Brown 2003;Riera et al 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of methods for a landscape-scale assessment of the cultural ecosystem services associated with different habitats

Gosal

Newton

Gillingham

2018

International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Servic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cultural ecosystem services (CES) are widely acknowledged as important but are often neglected by ecosystem service assessments, leading to a representational bias. This reflects the methodological challenges associated with producing robust and repeatable CES valuations. Here we provide a comparative analysis of three approaches for non-monetary valuation of CES, namely a structured survey, participatory GIS (PGIS) and GPS tracking methods. These were used to assess both recreation and aesthetic value of habitats within the New Forest National Park, UK. The association of CES with habitats enabled results of all three methods to be visualised at the landscape scale using maps, strengthening their value to conservation management. Broadleaved woodland and heathland habitats were consistently valued highly for both CES, whereas agricultural land tended to be associated with low values. Results obtained by the different methods were positively correlated in 6 out of 10 comparisons, indicating a degree of consistency between them. The spatial distribution of CES values at the landscape scale was also generally consistent between the three methods. These results highlight the value of comparative analyses of CES for identifying robust results, providing a way forward for their inclusion in land management decision-making. ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of methods for a landscape-scale assessment of the cultural ecosystem services associated with different habitats

Gosal

Newton

Gillingham

2018

International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Servic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The satiation of user's preferences regarding monocultures could lead to a higher preference of higher levels of tree species composition (Riera et al, 2012). Biodiversity per se has a high welfare economic value and people have shown a high WTP for this (e.g.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

European Mixed Forests: definition and research perspectives

et al. 2014

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim of study: We aim at (i) developing a reference definition of mixed forests in order to harmonize comparative research in mixed forests and (ii) review the research perspectives in mixed forests.Area of study: The definition is developed in Europe but can be tested worldwide.Material and Methods: Review of existent definitions of mixed forests based and literature review encompassing dynamics, management and economic valuation of mixed forests.Main results: A mixed forest is defined as a forest unit, excluding linear formations, where at least two tree species coexist at any developmental stage, sharing common resources (light, water, and/or soil nutrients). The presence of each of the component species is normally quantified as a proportion of the number of stems or of basal area, although volume, biomass or canopy cover as well as proportions by occupied stand area may be used for specific objectives. A variety of structures and patterns of mixtures can occur, and the interactions between the component species and their relative proportions may change over time.The research perspectives identified are (i) species interactions and responses to hazards, (ii) the concept of maximum density in mixed forests, (iii) conversion of monocultures to mixed-species forest and (iv) economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by mixed forests.Research highlights: The definition is considered a high-level one which encompasses previous attempts to define mixed forests. Current fields of research indicate that gradient studies, experimental design approaches, and model simulations are key topics providing new research opportunities.Keywords: COST Action; EuMIXFOR; mixed-species forests; admixtures of species.

show abstract

“…To assess the services in a comprehensive way, different means may be profitably combined: (a) deriving ESs from the analysis of landscape structures and processes; (b) seeking the advice of experts; (c) involving stakeholders and the public at large (Figure 3). Among the drawbacks imputed to economic valuation of ESs, we can find limitations due to the fact that it neglects social issues such as fairness and equity in the use of resources; elements of subjectiveness implicit in the choice of the method of valuation; special difficulties when trying to estimate in monetary terms regulating and maintaining services [93,99,100]. Monetary valuation is definitely not applicable when dealing with non-instrumental subjective values (such as spiritual values, identity, cultural heritage) or non-substitutable natural objects with inherent value [101].…”

Section: Ecosystem Services Assessment and Valuationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Balancing Economic Development and Environmental Conservation for a New Governance of Alpine Areas

Cantiani

Geitner

Haida³

et al. 2016

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:In the Alpine environment, Man has always been directly dependent on mountain ecosystems. Social mechanisms have created specific models of governance, capable of assuring the persistence of ecosystems and their capacity to provide essential goods and services. In recent decades, however, dramatic changes have occurred, such as climate change and changes in land use. The complexity common to all linked human-natural environment systems is extremely marked in the Alpine areas and this makes it difficult to understand how resilient these systems may be. Many research questions arise, in particular as to the comprehension and quantification of the impact of changes on the capacity of ecosystems to produce goods and services in a sustainable way, and the possibility of local mechanisms of governance to adapt to both current and future changes. Reasons and effects of change are analysed from the perspective of the specific issues of governance. The importance of the Ecosystems Services (ESs) concept is acknowledged and the necessity for a dynamic assessment of ESs, taking into account people's values and expectations, is particularly stressed. Through a careful analysis of selected papers and case studies, the main gaps in current knowledge are identified and directions for further research are provided.

show abstract

Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: Good practice guidelines

Cited by 68 publications

References 35 publications

Comparison of methods for a landscape-scale assessment of the cultural ecosystem services associated with different habitats

Comparison of methods for a landscape-scale assessment of the cultural ecosystem services associated with different habitats

European Mixed Forests: definition and research perspectives

Balancing Economic Development and Environmental Conservation for a New Governance of Alpine Areas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About