2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-market values of forest biodiversity and the impact of informing the general public: Insights from generalized multinomial logit estimations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with other recent studies on the value of cultural ecosystem services, especially with regard to the existence values of biodiversity conservation, the WTP elicited in this study is well within the current literature (see e.g., [11,24,25,[27][28][29]). Program B would lead to an increase of naturalness of about 10%; this corresponds to an additional value of € 108.25 per hectare per year compared with the status quo.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison with other recent studies on the value of cultural ecosystem services, especially with regard to the existence values of biodiversity conservation, the WTP elicited in this study is well within the current literature (see e.g., [11,24,25,[27][28][29]). Program B would lead to an increase of naturalness of about 10%; this corresponds to an additional value of € 108.25 per hectare per year compared with the status quo.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The examined attributes were as follows: the forest stand structure and age distribution, the volume of fallen deadwood, and the presence of trees of high ecological value. The mean estimated welfare effect for biodiversity-friendly forest management in state-owned forests, compared with an even-age one-species coniferous forest with no deadwood, was € 90-100 per household [29].…”
Section: A Brief Literature Review Of the Empirical And Methodologicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nielsen et al [12] used a choice experiment to assess the willingness to pay for species composition, height structure, and standing and fallen dead trees in Danish forests. Rambonilaza and Brahic [13] used a choice experiment to estimate the willingness to pay for forest attributes in publicly owned forests representing 15% of all the forests in France. Tilahun et al [14] valued rural households' willingness to pay for frankincense forest conservation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLM perspective on protected areas includes both "nature conservation" and "social welfare" [15,16,18,20,23,27,[29][30][31][32][33]. The concept of biodiversity, which refers to the variety of plant and animal species [34], has been identified not only as an important attribute of nature conservation [23], but as one which reflects the value derived from natural land use in protected areas [15], including wetland management [16] and forest parks [23].…”
Section: Conducting the Theoretical Thinking On Slmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we conducted on-site interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) with members of non-governmental organizations, managers of forest parks, and economists specializing in nonmarket evaluation [18,23,38]. Based on suggestions and feedback from the FGDs and the literature review, we chose the following attributes of this study; farming method [29][30][31]35], biodiversity [15,16,20,39], land use type [15,18,32,33,[39][40][41], ecotourism mode [18,27,34,37], WTD, and WTPT [15,18,23,39,42]. The key factors of SLM are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: The Attribute Design For Measuring the Publics' Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%