2010
DOI: 10.1016/s0973-0508(10)80025-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-metallic and metallic craniocerebral missile injuries: Varied outcome

Abstract: We studied the comparative outcome related to 694 non-metallic and metallic craniocerebral missile injuries who lived at 2 hours and beyond the time of injury in a retrospective and prospective analysis in the Department of Neurosurgery at Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) Kashmir, India, over a period of 21 years from September 1988 to March, 2010. The study revealed an overall mortality of 32.70% (227 out of 694). A total of 664 adults and 30 children (mostly teenagers) were studied. The 7… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,4,5 The nonmetallic missile injuries are probably the most contaminated penetrating injuries due to their vegetative and infective nature. 6 The pathophysiology of penetrating head injury depends on the kinetic energy and trajectory of the object through the brain. The principle of missile injuries is that low-velocity missile results in less damage in contrast to the high-velocity missile that causes extensive damage by cavitation and the rapid transfer of kinetic energy into surrounding tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,4,5 The nonmetallic missile injuries are probably the most contaminated penetrating injuries due to their vegetative and infective nature. 6 The pathophysiology of penetrating head injury depends on the kinetic energy and trajectory of the object through the brain. The principle of missile injuries is that low-velocity missile results in less damage in contrast to the high-velocity missile that causes extensive damage by cavitation and the rapid transfer of kinetic energy into surrounding tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%