1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19960318)366:4<643::aid-cne6>3.0.co;2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-mirror-symmetric patterns of callosal linkages in areas 17 and 18 in cat visual cortex

Abstract: In the cat, callosal connections in area 17 are largely confined to a 5-6-mm-wide strip at the 17/18 border. It is commonly thought that callosal fibers extending from between the 17/18 border regions interconnect loci that are mirror-symmetric with respect to the midline of the brain, but this idea has not been tested experimentally. The present study examined the organization of callosal linkages in the 17/18 border region of normal adult cats by analyzing the patterns of connections revealed in one hemisphe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
28
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
6
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, binocularity seems not to play an important organizing role in this pathway, since strabismus does not affect the pattern or number of callosal cells (49,50). Rather, the outcome of deafferentation is predicted by the effect of the manipulation on retinotopic correspondence between the two hemispheres (18,19,44,49,50). In deaf animals, there may be no information available on which to base elimination of connections, as in the retention of overlapped corticocortical (51) or thalamocortical (52) arbors after visual deprivation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, binocularity seems not to play an important organizing role in this pathway, since strabismus does not affect the pattern or number of callosal cells (49,50). Rather, the outcome of deafferentation is predicted by the effect of the manipulation on retinotopic correspondence between the two hemispheres (18,19,44,49,50). In deaf animals, there may be no information available on which to base elimination of connections, as in the retention of overlapped corticocortical (51) or thalamocortical (52) arbors after visual deprivation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…In cat visual cortex, bilateral deprivation or enucleation result in a reduced callosal projection (44)(45)(46), whereas monocular manipulations result in expanded callosal projections (16,47,48). However, binocularity seems not to play an important organizing role in this pathway, since strabismus does not affect the pattern or number of callosal cells (49,50). Rather, the outcome of deafferentation is predicted by the effect of the manipulation on retinotopic correspondence between the two hemispheres (18,19,44,49,50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since each hemisphere contains a representation of the contralateral visual hemifield, callosal fibers have been proposed to connect the two hemirepresentations of the whole visual field at the level of the midline. On the border between the primary and secondary visual areas of the cat and other mammals there is a band containing two mirror images (one in V1 and the other in V2) of the central, binocular visual field; each image has an ipsilateral and a contralateral representation of the central visual field (14)(15)(16). In this region, many callosal cells connect points of the contralateral visual representa- In the somatosensory cortex, S1, and the motor cortex, M1, callosal-projecting cells have been described to be restricted to a narrow band representing the body midline (see Ref.…”
Section: Functions Of Different Callosal Fiberssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The callosal pathway matures quite early in development and links retinotopically corresponding loci in the two hemispheres (Lewis and Olavarria, 1995;Olavarria, 1996). Interhemispheric linkages serve important functions, including binding together the separate representations of the two halves of the visual field (Berlucchi and Rizzolatti, 1968;Engel et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This organization is different from that observed in higher mammals such as cats and primates, in which callosal terminals are mainly concentrated at the border between area 17 and 18 (Olavarria, 1996;Houzel and Milleret, 1999). This raises the issue of whether callosal influences are as important for cortical development in higher mammals as reported here for the rat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%