2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non missile penetrating spinal injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 5 , 6 , 13 , 14 , 17 However, in all such cases with the exception of one, 14 patients had to have a normal preoperative neurological examination, and there was no evidence of direct neurovascular compromise by the retained object in any reported case of direct withdrawal. 5 , 6 , 13 , 17 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“… 5 , 6 , 13 , 14 , 17 However, in all such cases with the exception of one, 14 patients had to have a normal preoperative neurological examination, and there was no evidence of direct neurovascular compromise by the retained object in any reported case of direct withdrawal. 5 , 6 , 13 , 17 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“… 4 , 6–8 , 10 , 11 Visceral and vascular injuries are also commonly associated with NMPSIs. 5 , 7 , 12 Specifically, in the cervical region, there is a high risk of injury to the carotid and vertebral arteries 8 , 12 and the airway. 3 , 7 While knives remain the most common weapon used in NMPSIs, bicycle spokes, screwdrivers, axes, and other sharp objects have also been occasionally used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations