Non-native plant species richness and influence of greenhouses and human populations in the conterminous United States

Abstract

Background One issue in invasive plant ecology is identification of the factors related to the invasion process that increase number of non-native species. When invasion by non-native species increases, so does the probability that some non-native species will become harmful, or classified as invasive species, which disrupt natural ecosystems with attendant economic and social costs. I quantified patterns of how non-native species richness varied with vegetation types and human populations. To evaluate the relative importance of different predictor variables for invasion pathways in the conterminous United States, I modeled non-native plant species richness by county compared to current and historical human populations; greenhouses and nurseries; railroads, pipelines, transmission lines, and oil and gas wells; and land covers of impervious surface, development intensity categories, agriculture, and vegetation types. I also modeled these variables within vegetation types, excluding vegetation variables. Results To summarize patterns, non-native plant species richness increased from 72 to 200 with increasing human population density classes. Forests and forest land use mosaics had the greatest mean number of non-native plant species, ranging from 121 to 166, whereas grasslands and grassland mosaics had the least number of non-native plant species, about 70. For modeling variable importance, all combined variables had R2 values of 56% (random forests regressor) and 54% (cubist regressor) for predictions of withheld observations of non-native plant species richness, with greenhouse density and percent forestlands as most influential variables. Single variables of greenhouses (R2 = 29%), historical and current human populations (R2 = 27% and 23%), impervious surface (25%), and medium intensity development (23%) were most associated with non-native plant species richness. For vegetation types, greenhouse and historical human population densities were influential variables particularly in forestlands, shrublands, and wetlands. Conclusions Based on these models, human population measures and horticultural locations of greenhouses and plant nurseries may have stronger relationships than measures of land use disturbance and transport with non-native plant species richness.

Potential Interactions between Climate Change and Land Use for Forest Issues in the Eastern United States

“…Non-native plant species richness is greatest in the northeastern U.S. and along western coastal states, whereas the southeastern and interior U.S. have fewer non-native plant species [81]. Therefore, effects of non-native plants on forests may vary regionally and proportionally to the number of invasive species.…”