1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00147920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-normal surfaces of degree 5 and 6 in P n

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to describe the non-normal surfaces of degree 5 and 6 embedded in the complex projective space P", with n i> 4. The idea is to study the normalization of such a surface, and then to find how a non-normal surface can be obtained from its normalization.Let Yc Pn be a surface of degree d, linearly normal and not contained in any hyperplane of P~. If d ~< 4, the list of all such surfaces is known (cf. 1-23], [24]). If 5 ~< d ~< 8 and Y is smooth, the classification is also known (cf.[1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in Section 4 we deduce from the proof of the above Theorem some results which extend those in [5] and [8] to any algebraically closed field k of char(k) ≥ 0 (see Prop. 2 and Thm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, in Section 4 we deduce from the proof of the above Theorem some results which extend those in [5] and [8] to any algebraically closed field k of char(k) ≥ 0 (see Prop. 2 and Thm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…(4) a cone over a smooth rational curve of degree five; (5) (S, H) is a Gorenstein Del Pezzo surface of degree five with K S ≃ −H;…”
Section: Some Cases In Any Characteristicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since q(Y) = 0, it follows that q(Y) = 0 so that Y is normal, having only rational singularities (the last statement follows from Theorem 4 in [10], since the minimal desingularization of Y is a rational surface). EXAMPLE 11.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…From Theorem 4 of [25] and Lemma 3.3, we get that the only possibility is that F is the projection of a (possibly singular) Del Pezzo surface in P 5 .…”
Section: Case M =mentioning
confidence: 99%