2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non obstructive high-risk plaque but not calcified by coronary CTA, and the G-score predict ischemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among those with 30-50% diameter of stenosis, a minority of nadir FFR CT -positive vessels underwent ICA and revascularization. A recent study found that high-risk plaque, increasing lipid necrotic core and non-calcified plaque burden on coronary CTA predict ischemia in non-obstructive lesions [46]. Thus, for those with 30-50% diameter of stenosis, it may be reasonable to reserve FFR CT for those lesions with adverse plaque characteristics or significant atherosclerotic burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those with 30-50% diameter of stenosis, a minority of nadir FFR CT -positive vessels underwent ICA and revascularization. A recent study found that high-risk plaque, increasing lipid necrotic core and non-calcified plaque burden on coronary CTA predict ischemia in non-obstructive lesions [46]. Thus, for those with 30-50% diameter of stenosis, it may be reasonable to reserve FFR CT for those lesions with adverse plaque characteristics or significant atherosclerotic burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, less non-calcified plaque burden was observed in those being treated with vitamin D. Higher total plaque burden is a risk factor for MACE and ischemia [19,20], especially when applying a score weighting for the non-calcified plaque burden [21]. Beyond, our study revealed that while stenosis severity score was not different, the proportion of >50% stenosis was slightly higher in those who did not apply vitamin D. However, there was no difference in stenosis severity score (CAD-RADS TM ) and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Coronary stenosis severity was scored on a 5-point scale as: (1) minimal (<25%), [27], respectively. Total plaque burden was expressed by the coronary segment involvement (SIS) score [28], and the total mixed plaque burden weighted for the non-calcified plaque component was calculated as previously described [21] (sum of plaque types T1-4 for each segment, G-score) (Figure 1), per-coronary segment (AHA-modified-16-segment classification) [26]. (3) Quantitative High-risk plaque analysis [17,29,30]:…”
Section: Cta Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Calcified and non-calcified plaque components were defined as hyperand hypoattenuating lesions with > and < 150 HU [10]. The G-score [17] (= sum of plaque types T1-T4 for each segment), as radiologic marker for an increased noncalcifying plaque burden, per coronary segment (AHAmodified-16-segment classification) was calculated. 3) Quantitative High-risk plaque (HRP) analysis [8] & Non-calcified plaque (NCP) was defined as being hypodense as compared to vessel lumen, < 150 HU [18].…”
Section: Coronary Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%