2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2005.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Non)optimality of the Friedman rule and optimal taxation in a growing economy with imperfect competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Non-optimality of Friedman rule in the presence of distortionary taxes was …rst discussed by Phelps (1973). A selective reference to other sources of distortion include: van der Ploeg and Alogoskou…s (1994) for an externality underlying endogenous growth; Ireland (1996) for monopolistic competition; Erceg et al (2000) and Khan et al (2003) for nominal wage and price settings; Schmitt-Grohe and Uribe (2004a,b) for imperfections in the goods market; and Shaw et al (2006) for imperfect competition as well as externality. 1 violates this tax principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Non-optimality of Friedman rule in the presence of distortionary taxes was …rst discussed by Phelps (1973). A selective reference to other sources of distortion include: van der Ploeg and Alogoskou…s (1994) for an externality underlying endogenous growth; Ireland (1996) for monopolistic competition; Erceg et al (2000) and Khan et al (2003) for nominal wage and price settings; Schmitt-Grohe and Uribe (2004a,b) for imperfections in the goods market; and Shaw et al (2006) for imperfect competition as well as externality. 1 violates this tax principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the possible positive growth rate effect of money in Fukuda (1996) stems from the existence of dual balanced growth paths. Shaw et al (2006), in contrast, find that the long-run relationship between the rates of nominal interest and output growth is unambiguously negative. 14 In the literature with perfect markets and useless government spending, it has been found that a higher money growth enhances income expansion in the balanced growth equilibrium because of the intergenerational income redistribution effect of inflation or the agents pursuing a wealth-enhanced social status (van der Ploeg and Alogoskoufis, 1994; Mino and Shibata, 1995;Chang et al, 2000).…”
Section: Growth Rate Effects Of Fiscal and Monetary Policiesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Shaw et al . (), in contrast, find that the long‐run relationship between the rates of nominal interest and output growth is unambiguously negative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations