2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurger.2017.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-pharmacological interventions to prevent falls in older patients: Clinical practice recommendations – the SENATOR ONTOP Series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…34 Of the 159 records, 144 were excluded, yielding 15 records retained for final analyses and included in the data synthesis. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Table 1 shows the quality assessment characteristics using the AGREE-II tool for the 15 guidelines selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…34 Of the 159 records, 144 were excluded, yielding 15 records retained for final analyses and included in the data synthesis. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Table 1 shows the quality assessment characteristics using the AGREE-II tool for the 15 guidelines selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Accordingly, several medical societies and organizations in different countries have created clinical practice guidelines for fall prevention and management. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] These guidelines are typically based on systematic reviews of the available evidence and consensus by experts in the fields of geriatric medicine, rehabilitation medicine, and physiotherapy, among others. 28,29 Although several of these clinical practice guidelines for fall prevention have been published, little is known about the level of agreement between the recommendations made by them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, other important outcomes may have been excluded. The standardised method employed in all the ONTOP reviews ensures consistency and has already resulted in published evidence-based recommendations for nondrug management in delirium [34], falls [35,36], stroke [37], pressure sores [38,39], behavioural disturbances in dementia [40], malnutrition [41] and sarcopenia [42]. This method also has the advantage of not pre-specifying interventions in the search terms, allowing evaluation of lesser-known interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os 13 estudos que integram a amostra final obedecem aos critérios de inclusão e exclusão previamente definidos e possibilitam responder à questão e ao objetivo desta RIL. Os estudos incluídos são predominantemente primários (n=9) (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27) e de natureza quantitativa (n=8) (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)27) , com quatro RCT (20,21,25,27) , dois estudos de modelagem (23,24) , um estudo quasi-experimental (22) , um estudo descritivo (19) , quatro estudos são revisões de literatura com metodologia científica (4,9,18,28) e um estudo é qualitativo e metodológico (painel de peritos) (26) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Na categoria avaliação do risco ambiental, emerge a recomendação, consensual em todos os estudos, para a avaliação de segurança dentro de portas, de modo a identificar os riscos presentes nas casa do idosos, sobretudo nos que têm alto risco de queda (2,4,26) . A adequação da avaliação do risco conjugada com a implementação das medidas preventivas que o controlam (15) traduzem-se em vantagens econômicas (24) .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified