2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-pharmacological strategies for self-directed and interpersonal violence in people with severe mental illness: a rapid overview of systematic reviews

Abstract: IntroductionSelf-directed and interpersonal violence among people with severe mental illness has become a health priority. Though non-pharmacological interventions have been investigated, to our knowledge, no summary of all systematic reviews on this topic has been reported. We will conduct a rapid overview of reviews to synthesise evidence available by identifying systematic reviews on non-pharmacological interventions for self-directed or interpersonal violence in people with severe mental illness.Methods an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All authors gave their final approval of the version to be published." (121) AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND OTHER MATERIALS Item 27. Report which of the following are available, where they can be found, and under which conditions they may be accessed: template data collection forms; data collected from included systematic reviews and supplementary primary studies; analytic code; any other materials used in the overview of reviews.…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All authors gave their final approval of the version to be published." (121) AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND OTHER MATERIALS Item 27. Report which of the following are available, where they can be found, and under which conditions they may be accessed: template data collection forms; data collected from included systematic reviews and supplementary primary studies; analytic code; any other materials used in the overview of reviews.…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%