1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf00269393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-random distribution of deletion endpoints in the gal operon of E. coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may represent a deletion endpoint 'hot-spot'. Such clustering of deletion endpoints has been observed in the gal region of E. coli and has been shown to occur as a result both of heat induction of A (Pfeifer et at. 1974) and of /(Sfl-mediated deletion formation (Reif & Saedler, 1975).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This may represent a deletion endpoint 'hot-spot'. Such clustering of deletion endpoints has been observed in the gal region of E. coli and has been shown to occur as a result both of heat induction of A (Pfeifer et at. 1974) and of /(Sfl-mediated deletion formation (Reif & Saedler, 1975).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…would be expected (Pfeifer et al, 1974), to arise from specific processes. In the case of spontaneously generated deletions, there appears to be a 'hotspot' beyond purD since the majority of deletions have one endpoint that removes this locus (see also Linn et al, 1979).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the rearrangements involved in the construction of potential low frequency transducing strains are results of illegitimate recombination events (11). These occur rarely and very likely not with equal probability at all sites on participating DNA molecules (27,32). Hence, for any particular gene, not all approaches may yield transducing phages at a detectable frequency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%