Non-Reactive and Co-Reactive Additives in Cotton Cross-Linking

Valko, Emery I.; Olds, Walter F.; Tovey, Henry

doi:10.1177/004051756703700403

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In wet polymer-deposition studies [3,4,5] (so-called wet fixation processes), the swelling of the fiber and thereby, its penetration by the monomer and the final polymer distribution are emphasized. In still another direction, the latent reactivity of the deposited polymer with the cross-linking agent is being in-, vestigated [9,10] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improved Cotton DP Through Dry-Cure Deposition of Polymers Containing Reactive Groups1

Tolgyesi

1968

Textile Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Copolymers, based on multifunctional N-methylol cellulose reactants and urea or thiourea, were internally deposited in cotton by a pad-dry-cure process. The urea or thiourea prevented extensive cross-linking of the cellulose during polymer formation by competing with the cellulose hydroxyls for the reactive N-methylol groups. The durable-press fabric, obtained by cross-linking the copolymer-containing cotton with conventional N-methylol reactants, exhibited higher strength retention and abrasion resistance than similar fabrics without polymer deposit or containing only homopolymers of the N-methylol compounds. It is proposed that the improvement is due to crosslinking of the cellulose through the reactive urea or thiourea residues of the polymer matrix.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improved Cotton DP Through Dry-Cure Deposition of Polymers Containing Reactive Groups1

Tolgyesi

1968

Textile Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Wet-Fixation DP Process—Polymer Deposition1

Hollies¹

1967

Textile Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When made into simulated cuffs and laundered twenty times, twill fabric given a wet-fixation treatment was found to abrade quite differently from twill finished by a pad-dry-cure process. Sections of these fabrics examined in the electron microscope revealed an even distribution of resin in the wet-fixed samples and little tendency for fibrillation from beating or washing. The expansion techniques of the SURDD applied to these sections revealed a tight bonding of cellulose layers in the wet-fixed samples. Samples from the same treatments examined in the transmission-interference microscope revealed a definite loss in internal birefringence in the wet-fixed samples and a smaller loss in the pad-dry-cure samples, revealing again a difference in degree of penetration of the resins from the two systems. In addition, with this means of viewing in which the treated fibers appear in brilliant interference colors, there was clear indication of sub stantial polymer formation inside the fibers given the wet-fixation treatment. This is possible because the refractive index of these fiber sections can be measured directly, and this technique provides an interesting avenue for future studies of resin-treated cottons of optimum performance. Both types of treated cotton were observed in replica experiments, each showing a fiber surface coating, presumably of resin, masking the surface striations of untreated cotton. Strength and elongation measurements on yarns and fibers from these same samples revealed, however, that neither treatment resulted in measurable interfiber sticking or bonding. Instead, the differences in strength and elongation noted in the fabrics were even more pronounced in the yarns and fibers of each. Only the wet-fixed samples retained a substantial portion of the original cotton fiber strength and elongation properties. If these particular changes in cotton introduced by the wet-fixation process are the main ones responsible for the enhanced performance of treated fabrics, then it appears that there may be several routes to placing resins in the right location in cotton for effective use. Vapor-phase grafting may, indeed, be an example of such a variation.

show abstract

A Cross-Linking Agent for Cellulose

Browne

1967

Textile Research Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Non-Reactive and Co-Reactive Additives in Cotton Cross-Linking

Cited by 6 publications

References 8 publications

Improved Cotton DP Through Dry-Cure Deposition of Polymers Containing Reactive Groups1

Improved Cotton DP Through Dry-Cure Deposition of Polymers Containing Reactive Groups1

Wet-Fixation DP Process—Polymer Deposition1

A Cross-Linking Agent for Cellulose

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About