2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-59126-1_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-reference Image Quality Assessment for Fingervein Presentation Attack Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finger vein images are classified based on Image Quality Assessment (IQA) without giving any clear indication about the actual IQA used and any experimental results. In [21], the authors successfully apply general-purpose non-reference image quality metrics to discriminate real finger vein images from fake ones. Subsequent work [242] additionally applies natural scene statistics and looks into the issue of cross-sensor and crosssubject finger vein presentation attack detection.…”
Section: Presentation Attack Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finger vein images are classified based on Image Quality Assessment (IQA) without giving any clear indication about the actual IQA used and any experimental results. In [21], the authors successfully apply general-purpose non-reference image quality metrics to discriminate real finger vein images from fake ones. Subsequent work [242] additionally applies natural scene statistics and looks into the issue of cross-sensor and crosssubject finger vein presentation attack detection.…”
Section: Presentation Attack Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed system is said to operate in a walk-through style, while this is not entirely clear from the description. 21…”
Section: Hand-based Vascular Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two years later, the first competition on finger vein PAD was organised [75], where three different teams participated. Since then, different PAD approaches have been presented, based on either a video sequence and motion magnification [60], texture analysis [44,61,71], image quality metrics [7], or more recently, neural networks [52,59,63] and image decomposition [58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Dodge and Karam [11] demonstrated that deep neural networks are susceptible to image quality distortions, particularly to blur and noise. Another examples of known CV algorithms that are affected by the quality of the input images include finger vein detection [12], biometric sensor spoofing [13], face recognition [14], video stream recognition systems [15], deep learning reconstruction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [16], and multi-view activity recognition [17]. Object detection using YOLO [18] on the distorted (left) and pristine (right) images, taken from GoPro [19] dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%