Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-resection versus resection for an asymptomatic primary tumor in patients with unresectable Stage IV colorectal cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Ruo et al reported a benefit in median and 2-year survival times for patients initially treated with surgery, but in the multivariate analysis, only the volume of liver replacement was a significant predictor of survival [9]. A recent review by Cirocchi et al shows that the resection of the primary tumour in asymptomatic patients who are managed with chemo/radiotherapy is not associated with an improvement in overall survival or with a significant reduction of complication risks from the primary tumour [10]. Howbeit, a meta-analysis of eight retrospective comparative studies reported an improvement in the survival among patients with primary tumour palliative resection [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Ruo et al reported a benefit in median and 2-year survival times for patients initially treated with surgery, but in the multivariate analysis, only the volume of liver replacement was a significant predictor of survival [9]. A recent review by Cirocchi et al shows that the resection of the primary tumour in asymptomatic patients who are managed with chemo/radiotherapy is not associated with an improvement in overall survival or with a significant reduction of complication risks from the primary tumour [10]. Howbeit, a meta-analysis of eight retrospective comparative studies reported an improvement in the survival among patients with primary tumour palliative resection [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%