2019
DOI: 10.1111/head.13729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐Responders to Treatment With Antibodies to the CGRP‐Receptor May Profit From a Switch of Antibody Class

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
25
1
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
25
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that fremanezumab is effective and well tolerated in patients with migraine who had failed a different CGRP pathway–targeted mAb and therefore that treatment failure to 1 CGRP pathway–targeted mAb does not predict treatment failure to another. This finding supports previous evidence showing that patients who had prior failure of a CGRP pathway–targeted mAb treatment achieved a clinical benefit by switching to another CGRP pathway–targeted mAb [ 34 36 ]. In a previous retrospective cohort study by Overeem and colleagues that included 25 patients who did not respond to erenumab and switched to either galcanezumab or fremanezumab, MHD were significantly reduced by Month 3 after switching and approximately 12% of patients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in MHD [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results suggest that fremanezumab is effective and well tolerated in patients with migraine who had failed a different CGRP pathway–targeted mAb and therefore that treatment failure to 1 CGRP pathway–targeted mAb does not predict treatment failure to another. This finding supports previous evidence showing that patients who had prior failure of a CGRP pathway–targeted mAb treatment achieved a clinical benefit by switching to another CGRP pathway–targeted mAb [ 34 36 ]. In a previous retrospective cohort study by Overeem and colleagues that included 25 patients who did not respond to erenumab and switched to either galcanezumab or fremanezumab, MHD were significantly reduced by Month 3 after switching and approximately 12% of patients achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in MHD [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Because of the different targets of the two CGRP-mAb classes (ligand vs. receptor), it is conceivable that patients who did not respond to one CGRP-mAb class may benefit from a switch to the other class. Clinical observations support this hypothesis: one small case series reported three patients who did not respond to treatment with erenumab showed a substantial reduction of headache days after a switch to galcanezumab ( 6 ). Other than this case report no clinical trial assessed the effect of the switch of non-responders from one CGRP-mAb class to the subsequent exposure of another CGRP-mAb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Conversely, few data are available on the efficacy of antibody switch from erenumab to galcanezumab or fremanezumab in patients with a poor response to erenumab. 90 , 91 A retrospective case series allowed antibody switch after 3 erenumab administrations in those with a <30% response rate and showed that 32% patients achieved the >30% response rate and 12% the 50% response rate. Patients also reported a significant reduction in median MHDs but no in AMDs.…”
Section: Future Treatment Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%