2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2011.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-rigid image registration of brain magnetic resonance images using graph-cuts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of non-rigid methods, several techiniques have been used in medical image registration. Those consist of thin-plate spline [4], free-form deformations using B-splines [5-8], elastic models [9], fluid models [10-13], and Markov random field approaches [14-16]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of non-rigid methods, several techiniques have been used in medical image registration. Those consist of thin-plate spline [4], free-form deformations using B-splines [5-8], elastic models [9], fluid models [10-13], and Markov random field approaches [14-16]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extend this discrete second order smoothness term for use in a group-wise setting. Alpha expansion has also been effectively used to perform traditional pair-wise registration in So et al (2011), where their contribution outperformed the diffeomorphic demons algorithm found in the Insight Toolkit, as well as other discrete approaches such as Glocker et al (2008). Their idea was to perform alpha expansion using a set of displacement labels.…”
Section: Introduction and Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,33 The lung overlap error accounts for a coarse registration performance evaluation metric, 32 which however has been commonly used. 11,34,35 Finally, the determinant of Jacobian matrix of the deformation field is used to detect singularities of deformation fields. 20,22,36,37 Quantitative evaluation of image registration using clinical data is susceptible to both algorithm and intrinsic image data variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%