2004
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/25329214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice

Abstract: Image registration is an important enabling technology in medical image analysis. The current emphasis is on development and validation of application-specific non-rigid techniques, but there is already a plethora of techniques and terminology in use. In this paper we discuss the current state of the art of non-rigid registration to put on-going research in context and to highlight current and future clinical applications that might benefit from this technology. The philosophy and motivation underlying non-rig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
449
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 610 publications
(454 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
449
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This manual determination inevitably biases the registration and also subsequent analysis. In light of this, recently proposed groupwise registration algorithms consider the image population as a whole, by simultaneously deforming all individual images impartially, with the final goal of constructing an atlas which describes the population in an unbiased manner [1] [2]. Inferences drawn using an unbiased atlas can be expected to be more objective, and reflect more accurately the population characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This manual determination inevitably biases the registration and also subsequent analysis. In light of this, recently proposed groupwise registration algorithms consider the image population as a whole, by simultaneously deforming all individual images impartially, with the final goal of constructing an atlas which describes the population in an unbiased manner [1] [2]. Inferences drawn using an unbiased atlas can be expected to be more objective, and reflect more accurately the population characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several possible image metrics that are used in voxel similarity-based image registration (Crum et al, 2004;Hill et al, 2001;Maintz and Viergever, 1998;Rueckert and Schnabel, 2011;Zitova and Flusser, 2003): correlation coefficient, sum of squared differences, or mutual information (MI). MI (Maes et al, 1997;Mattes et al, 2003Mattes et al, , 2001Pluim et al, 2003;Wells et al, 1996) is one of the more successful medical image similarity measures.…”
Section: II State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantitatively measure the directionality of a directed metric, we define the relative difference between two directed measurements as the directionality significance. For the directed measurement of d as defined above, its directionality significance on the image pair (S, T) is defined as (2) We can also define the directionality significance sig r on the directed measurement of r in a similar way. For illustration, the directionality significances sig d and sig r are calculated for all image pairs in a dataset of 18 elderly brains with large shape difference [43].…”
Section: Directionality In Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-rigid image registration is one of the most important techniques in medical image analysis [1][2][3][4][5]. A large number of registration methods have been developed for pairwise image registration [6][7][8][9][10], where the subject is registered directly towards the template with the estimated spatial transformation by maximizing a certain similarity measure between the warped subject and the template.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%