2018
DOI: 10.4066/biomedicalresearch.29-17-1995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-rigid registration of medical images using a hierarchical framework with normalized mutual information

Abstract: Medical image registration plays a crucial role in medical field. Existing medical registration methods can be categorized as rigid registration and non-rigid registration methods. Compared with rigid registration, the non-rigid registration is more suitable for representing the anatomy's complicated deformation. In this study, we develop a non-rigid registration method in which Normalized Mutual Information (NMI) is used as similarity measurement and B-splines are used for transformation. The algorithm is imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in terms of overall segmentation effect and accuracy of details, the U-Net+DCAM algorithm proposed in this paper outperforms other models and is closer to the actual label values. In order to verify the precise performance of DeepLab V3, SETR, DAnet, OCnet, CCnet, and U-Net+DCAM semantic segmentation algorithms, we analyzed the experimental results using four objective indicators: Pixel Accuracy (PA), Mean Pixel Accuracy (MPA), Mean Intersection over Union (MIOU), and Kappa [24,25].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in terms of overall segmentation effect and accuracy of details, the U-Net+DCAM algorithm proposed in this paper outperforms other models and is closer to the actual label values. In order to verify the precise performance of DeepLab V3, SETR, DAnet, OCnet, CCnet, and U-Net+DCAM semantic segmentation algorithms, we analyzed the experimental results using four objective indicators: Pixel Accuracy (PA), Mean Pixel Accuracy (MPA), Mean Intersection over Union (MIOU), and Kappa [24,25].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%