IEEE International Radar Conference, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2005.1435911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-self-embedding context-free grammars for multifunction radar modeling ~ electronic warfare application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They supposed that most CFGs used to describe radar models are non-self-embedding (NSE). Visnevski et al 12 considered the signals from an MFR to be strings from some formal languages that can be modeled by a compact syntactic representation, which is called the NSE CFG, and made use of the theory of finite-state automata (FSA) to the electronic warfare (EW) signal processing of MFRs. Considering the aspect of radar words extracting, in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They supposed that most CFGs used to describe radar models are non-self-embedding (NSE). Visnevski et al 12 considered the signals from an MFR to be strings from some formal languages that can be modeled by a compact syntactic representation, which is called the NSE CFG, and made use of the theory of finite-state automata (FSA) to the electronic warfare (EW) signal processing of MFRs. Considering the aspect of radar words extracting, in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is advantageous to model complex patterns in such a way to benefit from the finite state automaton (FSA) theory background [25]. Owing to this evidence, FSA as ND 0 are used obtaining an adaptive finite automaton (AFA), a Turing-powerful device [22] indicated by Expression 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (15), SCFG is introduced as a framework to model MFRs' signal and it is shown that MFRs' dynamic behavior can be explicitly described using a finite set of rules corresponding to the production rules of the SCFG. SCFG has several potential advantages: i) SCFG is a compact formal representation that forms a homogeneous basis for modeling and storing complex system domain knowledge, and in which it is simpler and more natural for the model designer to express the control rules of MFR (16). ii) SCFG is more efficient in modeling hidden branching processes when compared to a stochastic regular grammars or hidden Markov models with the same number of parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%