2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-sensitive axis feedback control of test mass in full-maglev vertical superconducting gravity instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, even when the gravity sensor measurement axis is perfectly aligned with the gravitational acceleration direction, a small change of 45 μrad in the tilt angle will cause a deviation of 1 μGal in the gravitational acceleration measurement; meanwhile, a small change of 1.4 μrad will cause a deviation of 1 nGal (Goodkind, 1999). In addition, in terms of superconducting gravity gradiometers, Chen et al (2022) speculated that the low-frequency noise of their developed superconducting accelerometer did not attain the level of the background noise, and this may be due to the slow change of platform tilt or temperature variation, which needs further study. Paik and Lumley (1996) provided the calculation equation of the gravity gradient measurement error caused by the tilt; Griggs et al (2017) also reported the tilt sensitivity of superconducting gravity gradiometers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, even when the gravity sensor measurement axis is perfectly aligned with the gravitational acceleration direction, a small change of 45 μrad in the tilt angle will cause a deviation of 1 μGal in the gravitational acceleration measurement; meanwhile, a small change of 1.4 μrad will cause a deviation of 1 nGal (Goodkind, 1999). In addition, in terms of superconducting gravity gradiometers, Chen et al (2022) speculated that the low-frequency noise of their developed superconducting accelerometer did not attain the level of the background noise, and this may be due to the slow change of platform tilt or temperature variation, which needs further study. Paik and Lumley (1996) provided the calculation equation of the gravity gradient measurement error caused by the tilt; Griggs et al (2017) also reported the tilt sensitivity of superconducting gravity gradiometers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%