2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-sparse linear representations for visual tracking with online reservoir metric learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance evaluations of representative generative [1–30], discriminative [31–65] and combined methods [66–75] are summarised, and the results are shown in Tables 9 and 10. In visual tracking field, according to most literatures, the number of successfully tracked frames and the average position errors is commonly used as evaluation standards to quantitatively evaluate tracking performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Performance evaluations of representative generative [1–30], discriminative [31–65] and combined methods [66–75] are summarised, and the results are shown in Tables 9 and 10. In visual tracking field, according to most literatures, the number of successfully tracked frames and the average position errors is commonly used as evaluation standards to quantitatively evaluate tracking performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture information on the correlation between different feature dimensions, Li et al [64] incorporated an online metric learning into a tracking algorithm based on the non-sparse linear representation. Moreover, in order to prevent unbounded growth in the number of training samples for the metric learning, they designed a time-weighted reservoir sampling method to balance sample diversity and adaptability.…”
Section: Methods Based On Online Metric Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%