Non-speech oral motor treatment for children with developmental speech sound disorders

Lee, Alice; Gibbon, Fiona

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009383.pub2

Cited by 38 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Our present findings indicate that SLPs use nonspeech oral motor exercises (NSOMEs) in the intervention process for all diagnostic groups, similar to what has been observed in other countries (Brumbaugh & Smit, 2013;Joffe & Pring, 2008;Rumbach et al, 2016;Ruscello, 2008;Watson & Lof, 2009). In their recent review, Lee and Gibbon (2015) concluded that there is no strong evidence that NSOMEs are an effective treatment or addition to the intervention of children with phonological speech disorder. Similarly, Pennington et al (2016) found only three studies in which nonspeech exercises were examined for children with dysarthria, and none of these showed any improvement.…”

Section: Nonspeech Oral Motor Movementssupporting

confidence: 85%

Clinical Reasoning for Speech Sound Disorders: Diagnosis and Intervention in Speech-Language Pathologists' Daily Practice

Diepeveen

Haaften

Terband

et al. 2020

Am J Speech Lang Pathol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to give an insight in clinical reasoning (diagnosis and intervention) of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in the Netherlands for children with speech sound disorder (SSD). Method The study featured a mixed-method (qualitative and quantitative) design. Semistructured interviews containing nondirective, open-ended questions were conducted with 33 SLPs, which were analyzed using a constant comparative analysis. Other SLPs (137) filled out a questionnaire on the same topics. Multiple-choice questions were analyzed by descriptive frequencies, while open-ended questions were analyzed thematically. Results The results indicate that SLPs use a variety of assessments to diagnose SSD, complemented by observation and, often, case history. In total, 85 different diagnostic labels were reported. The choice of intervention is based on what is appealing to the child and what matches his or her age as well as on the specific diagnosis and severity. Interventions are used for multiple speech disorders, and according to SLPs, parents play a large role in diagnostics and intervention. Conclusion These results reveal the need for (a) a clear and consistent terminology of diagnoses in the field of pediatric SSD, (b) a fast and easy-to-administer comprehensive differential diagnostic instrument in combination with an instrument to assess participation in everyday life, and (c) a tool to conduct a case history online.

show abstract

Section: Nonspeech Oral Motor Movementssupporting

confidence: 85%

Clinical Reasoning for Speech Sound Disorders: Diagnosis and Intervention in Speech-Language Pathologists' Daily Practice

Diepeveen

Haaften

Terband

et al. 2020

Am J Speech Lang Pathol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Subsequently, the first and third authors chose MeSH terms for explosion if all subordinate terms were truly relevant to the content area and research questions. Second, review of other relevant systematic or scoping reviews revealed additional possibilities for MeSH terms and context-dependent terms (eg, title, abstract and keywords) in the areas of swallowing-feeding65–68 and communication 69–72. The two authors (HF and ME) developing the search strategy selected terms for a paediatric population from a published filter,73 identified by the research librarian, rather than limit the search within Medline.…”

Section: Methods and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Swallowing behaviours and feeding environment in relation to communication development from early infancy to 6 years of age: a scoping review protocol

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionUnderstanding the influences of early swallowing function and feeding environment on the development of communication will enhance prevention and intervention initiatives for young children. This scoping review will help elucidate key elements affecting the developmental trajectory of communicative systems, typically robust and well-developed by formal school entry. We aim to (1) map the current state of the literature in a growing field of interest that has the potential to advance knowledge translation, (2) identify existing gaps and (3) provide research direction for future investigations surrounding feeding-swallowing functions and environment that support or forestall communication development in young children.Methods and analysisWe are proposing a scoping review to identify the breadth and depth of the existing literature regarding swallowing-feeding functions and environment relative to the onset and progression of communicative behaviours from infancy to 6 (<6;0) years of age. Our protocol delineates rigorous methods according to Arskey and O’Malley’s framework and includes elaborations by Levac and colleagues. We will search the literature based on 10 databases, 17 peer-reviewed journals, 4 conference proceedings and 6 grey literature sources. Two authors will independently screen abstracts and review full articles, remaining blind to each other’s results. A third author will contribute to resolving any discrepant results from both the abstract and article review. Subsequently, we will extract data and chart information from accepted articles using a pre-established data collection form. We will stratify results according to healthy versus impaired swallowing-feeding functions and communication development.Ethics and disseminationOur scoping review does not require ethical approval. We will disseminate our final study results through international and national conference presentations, publication in a peer-reviewed journal and knowledge translation activities with stakeholders.

show abstract

“…Pertanyaan tentang efektifitas NSOMT pada penanganan gangguan bunyi bicara menunjukkan bahwa diskusi tentang Evidence Based Practice (EBP) merupakan komponen esensial. EBP memberikan gambaran bahwa NSOMT tidak memiliki dampak signifikan terhadap penanganan gangguan bunyi bicara (Lass & Pannbacker, 2008;Lee & Gibbon, 2011;Mccauley et al, 2009;Powell, 2008). Meskipun tidak memiliki level EBP yang kuat dalam sebagai metode intervensi, pendekatan ini merupakan pendekatan yang cukup popular digunakan terapis wicara dalam penanganan gangguan bunyi bicara.…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

“…Meskipun dikenal efektif dalam penanganan gangguan makan dan menelan, NSOMT memiliki kontroversial ketika digunakan sebagai metode penanganan gangguan bunyi bicara. NSOMT dianggap memiliki eviden yang lemah ketika diterapkan dalam gangguan artikulasi dan fonologi (Lee & Gibbon, 2011;Lof & Watson, 2010;Muttiah et al, 2011).…”

Section: Pembahasanunclassified

Penggunaan Non Speech Oral Motor Treatment (NSOMT) Sebagai Pendekatan Intervensi Gangguan Bunyi Bicara

Pratomo

Siswanto

2020

j.keterapian.fis.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background : Non Speech Oral Motor Treatment’s (NSOMT) is a collective term that require active and passive training of speech musculature (Lof & Watson, 2008). Controversy of use this method was found in several publication. Researcher notes many questions about NSOMT efication. Aim of study is to gather information about utility NSOMT among Speech Therapist’s in Central Java. Isssue of Evidence Based Practice (EBP)implementation was crucial to be answer. This study was to analyse use of NSOMT among central java clinicians who treat children with speech sound disorder. Methods: This study was conducted in March until July 2019. Total 146 speech therapist across Central Java was participated on this study. Data analysis used descriptive statistic and Spearman Rank. Results: 84,9% speech therapist in Central Java used NSOMT to treat children who have speech sound disorder. Education level had a correlation with utility NSOMT in speech sound intervention (OR: 4.61; 95%: 1.44-14.72; p: 0.010). Conclusions: The results suggested similar finding with survey was conducted before. Speech therapist needs to improve their knowledge about EBP and its implementation.

show abstract

Non-speech oral motor treatment for children with developmental speech sound disorders

Abstract: Non-speech oral motor treatment for children with developmental speech sound disorders (Review)

Cited by 38 publications

References 47 publications

Clinical Reasoning for Speech Sound Disorders: Diagnosis and Intervention in Speech-Language Pathologists' Daily Practice

Clinical Reasoning for Speech Sound Disorders: Diagnosis and Intervention in Speech-Language Pathologists' Daily Practice

Swallowing behaviours and feeding environment in relation to communication development from early infancy to 6 years of age: a scoping review protocol

Penggunaan Non Speech Oral Motor Treatment (NSOMT) Sebagai Pendekatan Intervensi Gangguan Bunyi Bicara

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About