2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2017.10.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-spherical solid-non-Newtonian liquid fluidization and ANN modelling: Minimum fluidization velocity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The artificial neural network (ANN) has been considered as the efficient method to solve complex nonlinear problems with great rate processing, wide capacity, and simplicity, compared with traditional statistical methods . A number of ANN models have been reported to estimate the performance of nonlinear and complicated processes without assuming the exact relationship between input or output variables. …”
Section: Artificial Neural Network (Ann) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The artificial neural network (ANN) has been considered as the efficient method to solve complex nonlinear problems with great rate processing, wide capacity, and simplicity, compared with traditional statistical methods . A number of ANN models have been reported to estimate the performance of nonlinear and complicated processes without assuming the exact relationship between input or output variables. …”
Section: Artificial Neural Network (Ann) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is more, the correlation focusing on span has not been proposed, so Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) is conducted to fit the nonlinear relationship of parameters with d 32 and span . ,, In this ANN method, the input layer contains five parameters N , Q C , Φ, h r , and the number of stator openings, and all 60 sets of experimental data of the blind-side rotor-circular opening stator assembly are divided into training sets (80%) and testing sets (20%) and normalized before use. The Sigmoid function is used as the activation function and Levenberg–Marquardt as the training algorithm. , The obtained ANN structure is shown in Figure S8 in the Supporting Information. The prediction results in Figure show that the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) for the estimation of d 32 is 0.9991 and 0.9988 for the training and testing sets, respectively, and R 2 for estimating span is 0.9993 and 0.9907, respectively, which indicates that the ANN structure allows for relatively accurate estimation in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to establish a simple mathematical relationship between the micromixing time and various operating conditions and structural parameters of the in-line HSM due to the uncertainty and complexity of the reaction system. Here, we used the feed-forward backpropagation neural network (BPNN) , to establish the artificial neural network (ANN) model for predicting the micromixing time under different operating conditions and structural parameters of the in-line HSM. The input layer was designed to include four input parameters, involving rotor tip speed ( u t ), solid concentration ( C M ), rotor teeth number ( N t ), and shear gap (δ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%