2016
DOI: 10.15622/sp.45.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Stationary Models of a Local Server of the Automated System for Monitoring Artificial Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Program complexity models based on the relationship between the software complexity metrics and program quality, reliability, and safety parameters It should be noted that the latter three classes of test models are rather well developed 2 [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. For example, today, about 200 time models are known, mainly, NHPP models (e.g., [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]). At the same time, debugging models (also known as reliability growth models based on input data areas and revisions) are usually related only to Nelson's model and its modifications [22] developed at the dawn of the programming theory and do not reflect peculiarities of the modern team software development methods.…”
Section: Non-monotonic Models Of Software Reliability and Security Evmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Program complexity models based on the relationship between the software complexity metrics and program quality, reliability, and safety parameters It should be noted that the latter three classes of test models are rather well developed 2 [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. For example, today, about 200 time models are known, mainly, NHPP models (e.g., [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]). At the same time, debugging models (also known as reliability growth models based on input data areas and revisions) are usually related only to Nelson's model and its modifications [22] developed at the dawn of the programming theory and do not reflect peculiarities of the modern team software development methods.…”
Section: Non-monotonic Models Of Software Reliability and Security Evmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approval of mandatory requirements for formalizing the results of compliance assessment of high-confidence information protection software [1] lent relevance to the use of mathematical models for assessing IS software performance reliability and safety. Although studies into mathematical models for software reliability assessment were first undertaken back in the second half of the last century [2,3], these issues remain relevant nowadays [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. All this relates both to software manufacturing technologies (for example, open source software) and to newly introduced international standards in the software engineering and information security area (ISO/IEC 15408, ISO/IEC 33001, IEC 61508, IEC 61511 etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%