2006
DOI: 10.1128/aem.72.3.2080-2091.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Sulfate-Reducing, Syntrophic Bacteria Affiliated with Desulfotomaculum Cluster I Are Widely Distributed in Methanogenic Environments

Abstract: The classical perception of members of the gram-positive Desulfotomaculum cluster I as sulfate-reducing bacteria was recently challenged by the isolation of new representatives lacking the ability for anaerobic sulfate respiration. For example, the two described syntrophic propionate-oxidizing species of the genus Pelotomaculum form the novel Desulfotomaculum subcluster Ih. In the present study, we applied a polyphasic approach by using cultivation-independent and culturing techniques in order to further chara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
131
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
131
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the DsrAB-based tree, the deltaproteobacterial SRB group was monophyletic and the Desulfobacterium anilini-related SRB group was suggested to be the donor lineage for the xenologous dsrAB genes of the Desulfotomaculum subclusters Ib, Ic, Id and Ie, as well as Moorella thermoacetica (member of the Thermoanaerobacteriales). Desulfosporosinus and the Desulfotomaculum subclusters Ia, If and Ih have been postulated to represent the DsrAB-'authentic' Gram-positive SRB clades that were not affected by LGT (Imachi et al, 2006;Klein et al, 2001;Zverlov et al, 2005). The xenologous gene displacements of the orthologous dsrAB genes in subclusters Ib-Ie are supported by the AprB/A phylogeny of this study, because Desulfotomaculum subclusters Ia/If and Desulfosporosinus consistently branch close to the root of the DsrAB-and AprB/A-based trees.…”
Section: Comparison Of Aprba and Dsrab Phylogeny From Srpsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…However, in the DsrAB-based tree, the deltaproteobacterial SRB group was monophyletic and the Desulfobacterium anilini-related SRB group was suggested to be the donor lineage for the xenologous dsrAB genes of the Desulfotomaculum subclusters Ib, Ic, Id and Ie, as well as Moorella thermoacetica (member of the Thermoanaerobacteriales). Desulfosporosinus and the Desulfotomaculum subclusters Ia, If and Ih have been postulated to represent the DsrAB-'authentic' Gram-positive SRB clades that were not affected by LGT (Imachi et al, 2006;Klein et al, 2001;Zverlov et al, 2005). The xenologous gene displacements of the orthologous dsrAB genes in subclusters Ib-Ie are supported by the AprB/A phylogeny of this study, because Desulfotomaculum subclusters Ia/If and Desulfosporosinus consistently branch close to the root of the DsrAB-and AprB/A-based trees.…”
Section: Comparison Of Aprba and Dsrab Phylogeny From Srpsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…It is known that these sulfate reducers are able to grow by fermentation in low-sulfate environments (Henry et al, 1994;Nazina et al, 2005). In addition, a few members of the genus Desulfotomaculum degrade organic matter to H 2 and CO 2 through fermentation process and grow in syntrophic association with hydrogenotrophic methanogens in the absence of sulfate (Imachi et al, 2006). The dominant species related to sulfate-reducing bacteria in the clone library (SMD-B01 and SMD-B02) may grow by fermentation and degrade organic matter to H 2 and CO 2 in the deep aquifer, because the groundwater has low concentrations of sulfate and sulfide (Supplementary Table S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some SRB appear to have adopted a facultative syntrophic lifestyle in the absence of sulfate [33], degrading e.g. propionic acid with methanogenic Archaea, whereas some erstwhile SRB appear to have lost the ability to reduce sulfate [36]. This indicates that adaptation upon selection pressure and niche occupation is an ongoing mechanism also in biogas microbiology and may be exploited in respective biotechnological developments.…”
Section: Microbiology and Process Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%