2010
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/43/23/235402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-superposition effects in the Dirichlet–Casimir effect

Abstract: We study non-superposition effects in the Dirichlet-Casimir interaction energy for N boundaries in d spatial dimensions, quantifying its departure from the case of an interaction where a superposition principle is valid. We first derive some general results about those effects, and then show that they become negligible only when the distances between surfaces are larger than the sizes of each individual surface. We consider different examples of this situation in one, two and three spatial dimensions. Finally,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a system of three atoms these effects were discussed in 1943 by Axilrod and Teller [18], and for N molecules they were discussed, in 1985, by Power and Thirunamachandran [19]. Recently, nonadditive effects were discussed for macroscopic bodies [20,21]. Here our purpose is to discuss the nonadditivity of the van der Waals interaction in systems involving an atom and complementary surfaces, such as the above-discussed atom-disk system and an atom interacting with an infinite conducting plate with a circular hole.…”
Section: Nonadditivity In the Van Der Waals Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a system of three atoms these effects were discussed in 1943 by Axilrod and Teller [18], and for N molecules they were discussed, in 1985, by Power and Thirunamachandran [19]. Recently, nonadditive effects were discussed for macroscopic bodies [20,21]. Here our purpose is to discuss the nonadditivity of the van der Waals interaction in systems involving an atom and complementary surfaces, such as the above-discussed atom-disk system and an atom interacting with an infinite conducting plate with a circular hole.…”
Section: Nonadditivity In the Van Der Waals Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the applicability of the DE depends in this case on the analyticity of g (2) (n, 0) as a function of n. On the other hand, these problems with k || do not appear when Dirichlet conditions are fixed, since in that case the zero-momentum expansion of the function equivalent to g(k || ) has only the O(k 2 || ) term, apart from the constant one.…”
Section: Order 2 In ηmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main reasons for that is that those expectation values usually do not satisfy a superposition principle, when regarded as functionals of the boundary. Thus, it is not possible, in general, to calculate the total energy in the presence of a given boundary, by adding the contributions due to each one of the possible pairs of surface elements into which the boundary may be decomposed [2]. As a consequence, rather few 'universal' (i.e., applicable to an arbitrary surface) properties of the Casimir effect are known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…g µν p µ p ν + m 2 c 2 becomes g µνq µqν + 2 /m 2 c 2 ). If we perform first the integral over the world line metric, the mass shell constraint is implemented (see [35] for a version implementing Dirichlet boundary conditions in field theory)…”
Section: The Relation To the Green Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%