2016
DOI: 10.7883/yoken.jjid.2015.589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non Susceptibility of Neonatal and Adult Rats against the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

Abstract: SUMMARY:The present study examined the susceptibility of rats to the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and determined whether this animal is a suitable model for MERSCoV infection. Immunohistochemical analysis identified dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4), a known receptor for MERS-CoV on type I pneumocytes from infected rats. Whereas adult rats developed antibodies against MERS-CoV spike protein after intranasal inoculation, there was no evidence of viral replication in the lungs of adult, yo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When generating and validating the cELISA, three positive control sera and 42 negative control sera were used. The three positive controls were from two rabbits that had been immunized with recombinant MERS-CoV S and a rat that had been infected with MERS-CoV (Fukuma et al, 2015;Iwata-Yoshikawa et al, 2016). The 42 negative controls were sera from ten mice that had been immunized with recombinant SARS-CoV S protein (Ishii et al, 2009), two rabbits immunized with recombinant MERS-CoV N protein (Fukuma et al, 2015), a rabbit immunized with recombinant SARS-CoV S protein (Fukuma et al, 2015), a rabbit immunized with UV-inactivated SARS-CoV particles (Fukushi et al, 2005), four mock-infected rats, 12 non-immunized mice, and 12 healthy human donors.…”
Section: Serum Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When generating and validating the cELISA, three positive control sera and 42 negative control sera were used. The three positive controls were from two rabbits that had been immunized with recombinant MERS-CoV S and a rat that had been infected with MERS-CoV (Fukuma et al, 2015;Iwata-Yoshikawa et al, 2016). The 42 negative controls were sera from ten mice that had been immunized with recombinant SARS-CoV S protein (Ishii et al, 2009), two rabbits immunized with recombinant MERS-CoV N protein (Fukuma et al, 2015), a rabbit immunized with recombinant SARS-CoV S protein (Fukuma et al, 2015), a rabbit immunized with UV-inactivated SARS-CoV particles (Fukushi et al, 2005), four mock-infected rats, 12 non-immunized mice, and 12 healthy human donors.…”
Section: Serum Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MERS-CoV was cultured in BSL-3 laboratory of National Institute of Infectious Diseases as described previously (Iwata-Yoshikawa et al, 2016). Vero cells were inoculated with MERS-CoV at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1.0 per cell.…”
Section: Preparation Of Mers-cov Antigen For the Celisamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations