2015
DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-targeted Tracer Fate Detection

Abstract: Stable isotopes have been used to trace atoms through metabolism and quantify metabolic fluxes for several decades. Only recently non-targeted stable isotope labeling approaches have emerged as a powerful tool to gain biological insights into metabolism. However, the manual detection of isotopic enrichment for a non-targeted analysis is tedious and time consuming. To overcome this limitation, the non-targeted tracer fate detection (NTFD) algorithm for the automated metabolome-wide detection of isotopic enrichm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-targeted detection of stable isotope labeling and mass isotopolome analysis were performed using an in-house software based on the NTFD algorithm [ 13 , 14 , 27 ]. For data analysis we considered all compounds for which the NTFD algorithm detected at least under one experimental condition two mass spectrometric fragments with a coefficient of MID determination of R 2 >0.98, , M 0 abundance of 0.45<M 0 <1 and minimal enrichment 1−M 0 ≥0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-targeted detection of stable isotope labeling and mass isotopolome analysis were performed using an in-house software based on the NTFD algorithm [ 13 , 14 , 27 ]. For data analysis we considered all compounds for which the NTFD algorithm detected at least under one experimental condition two mass spectrometric fragments with a coefficient of MID determination of R 2 >0.98, , M 0 abundance of 0.45<M 0 <1 and minimal enrichment 1−M 0 ≥0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass isotopomer distribution (MID) (i.e. M þ 0 2 M þ 10) for every detected and labelled fragment ion was calculated using the strictest detection settings in NTFD, in order to minimize the generation of false positives [37,38]. Compounds were considered enriched if at least two spectral fragments were detected under at least one experimental treatment, R 2 ¼ 0.98, minimal enrichment ¼ 5, and maximal fragment deviation ¼ 0.02.…”
Section: (G) Data Analysis and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All detected isotopically enriched mass spectrometric fragments can be analyzed. If replicate measurements are provided, confidence intervals and quality measures of MID determination such as coefficient of determination are provided (Weindl et al , 2015b). …”
Section: Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MIDs are determined from the difference between mass spectra of an isotopically enriched compound and those of the non-enriched compound (Weindl et al , 2015b). Thus, two metabolite extracts need to be measured: One from a stable isotope labeling experiment and one from a label-free experiment.…”
Section: Experimental Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%