2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-trophic effects of earthworms on enchytraeids: An experimental investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because enchytraeids and earthworms have close habitats, interactions may occur, especially competition for food resources (Karaban and Uvarov, 2014;Domínguez and Bedano, 2016).…”
Section: Relationships Between Oligochaeta and Feeding Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because enchytraeids and earthworms have close habitats, interactions may occur, especially competition for food resources (Karaban and Uvarov, 2014;Domínguez and Bedano, 2016).…”
Section: Relationships Between Oligochaeta and Feeding Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Beylich and Graefe (2012) highlighted that the density of both families was not significantly correlated in various land uses: forest, wet grassland, grassland, and cropland. Under controlled conditions, Karaban and Uvarov (2014) reported that the inoculation of two individuals of the epigeic species Lumbricus rubellus negatively affected enchytraeid number (from 255 to 204 individuals per experimental unit) and especially litter enchytraeids (species not specified), which nearly disappeared. By contrast, positive effects of two A. caliginosa -an endogeic earthworm species -were observed on enchytraeid number (from 255 to 477 individuals per experimental unit) mainly explained by non-trophic relationships (i.e.…”
Section: Relationships Between Oligochaeta and Feeding Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge about the relationships among earthworms, enchytraeids and nematodes remains limited, especially in the urban context where more is known also about each individual group, and bioindication tools for assessing soil quality are still being developed [29,99,100]. The effect that each of these groups has on the others or on interactions with other groups such as collembolans has been studied in forest and agricultural soils, especially showing effects of earthworms on smaller soil organisms [40,41,[101][102][103][104]. In our study, no significant correlation was found between earthworms and enchytraeid and/or nematode assemblages, suggesting that these three groups represent potential complementary indicators of soil conditions and functioning in urban soils.…”
Section: Annelid and Nematode Assemblages' Relationships And Their Ecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the well-documented strong effects of earthworms as ecosystem engineers on soil mesofauna communities (Brown 1995;Eisenhauer 2010;Karaban and Uvarov 2014), effects on earthworms by subordinate ecosystem players, such as mesofauna, can intuitively be suggested as being weak; indeed, so far they have received little attention. However, the present experiment showed evident earthworm responses to manipulations of a mesofauna community.…”
Section: Hypotheses Testingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Changes Communicated by Stefan Scheu. Salmon 2001Salmon , 2004Eisenhauer 2010;Karaban and Uvarov 2014). These effects also vary with respect to earthworm ecological identity and mesofauna group (as reviewed by Eisenhauer 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%