2007
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.2007.4378668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Uniform Slant Correction for Handwritten Text Line Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative option is to shear text lines or words individually, but this is less reliable and breaks ink traces at region boundaries. It is also possible to eliminate slant non-uniformly within each text line, but this seems to add little or no improvement, despite the added complexity (Bertolami et al, 2007). The page-level approach is simple, fast and keeps the signal structurally intact.…”
Section: Slant-eliminated Handwritingmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative option is to shear text lines or words individually, but this is less reliable and breaks ink traces at region boundaries. It is also possible to eliminate slant non-uniformly within each text line, but this seems to add little or no improvement, despite the added complexity (Bertolami et al, 2007). The page-level approach is simple, fast and keeps the signal structurally intact.…”
Section: Slant-eliminated Handwritingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is a standard step in handwriting recognition systems, which use it to optimize recognition of the textual contents (Bertolami et al, 2007;Kavallieratou et al, 2001). It has also been called ''deslanting'', ''slant removal'', and ''slant correction''.…”
Section: Slant-eliminated Handwritingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the actual configuration of the particular experiments and the recognizer used, word error rates between 37.3% [9] and approximately 53% [117] have been achieved. Furthermore, in [117] results for evaluations on the Cambridge database (≈9% WER) were reported.…”
Section: Iammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Schematic overview of a typical architecture for an HMM-based handwriting recognition system. Example whiteboard data, preprocessing, and recognition results shown are taken from [125] successful methods rely on gradient information extracted from the text-line image (cf., e.g., [9,38]), which is often binarized in advance.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work is similar to [Slavík et al 2001] in which Sobel filters are computed to calculate the best slant angle. [Bertolami, Uchida, et al 2007] uses a local slant correction instead of averaging the slant of each word/line. An alternative is to use ML to estimate the MBA avoiding geometrical heuristics.…”
Section: Skew and Slant Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%