1997
DOI: 10.1002/mats.1997.040060216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐uniqueness in determination of terminal and penultimate model reactivity ratios in the styrene‐methyl methacrylate free‐radical copolymerization system

Abstract: SUMMARY:The terminal and penultimate model reactivity ratios in the free-radical copolymerization of styrene and methyl methacrylate in bulk at 40 "C were calculated by means of the simplex and scanning methods. Calculations showed that for the terminal model rl and r2 vary in comparatively narrow ranges of 0.548 -0.552 and 0.480-0.483, respectively. For the penultimate model, the most accurate reactivity ratios calculated by the simplex method, which were rI1 = 0.727, r22 = 0.490, r2, = 2.890, r12 = 4.583, ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were obtained for both the STY-MMA and STY-AN monomer systems. 3,4,12 Contrary to the STY-MMA system, for which the penultimate model did not yield any significant improvement in the fit to experimental data when compared to the terminal model, implications of the nonuniqueness in determining the penultimate-model reactivity ratios can be quite different for the system displaying a pronounced penultimate unit effect (e.g., the STY-AN system). This is quite obvious, because for examining solvent effects formulated in terms of the relation between the copolymer composition and the monomer-feed composition (the so-called "bootstrap effect" by Harwood 13 ), an adequate kinetic model and well-fitted reactivity ratios are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were obtained for both the STY-MMA and STY-AN monomer systems. 3,4,12 Contrary to the STY-MMA system, for which the penultimate model did not yield any significant improvement in the fit to experimental data when compared to the terminal model, implications of the nonuniqueness in determining the penultimate-model reactivity ratios can be quite different for the system displaying a pronounced penultimate unit effect (e.g., the STY-AN system). This is quite obvious, because for examining solvent effects formulated in terms of the relation between the copolymer composition and the monomer-feed composition (the so-called "bootstrap effect" by Harwood 13 ), an adequate kinetic model and well-fitted reactivity ratios are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This method enables to estimate reactivity ratios and related standard deviations with optional precision. With a scanning procedure based on the simplex method, it has been demonstrated 4,12 that the equivalent representation of the copolymer composition in terms of the monomer-feed composition can be achieved with multiple penultimate-model reactivity ratios. These multiple penultimate-model reactivity ratios belong to two different sets of parameters, Set I and Set II, resulting from two different initial guesses for r 11 , r 22 , r 21 , and r 12 (Guess I: r 11 ϭ r 21 ϭ r 1 , r 22 ϭ r 12 ϭ r 22 ; Guess II: r 11 ϭ r 1 , r 21 ϭ 1/r 2 , r 22 ϭ r 2 , r 12 ϭ 1/r 1 ) used for the nlls approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MML method in principle can be used also for the penultimate (or any other suitable) model. However, its use has been excluded due to the non-uniqueness in determination of the penultimate model parameters for the styrene -methyl methacrylate copolymerization system in bulk discussed in one of our previous papers [9].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the penultimate model, additionally non-uniqueness in the determination of the reactivity ratio parameters should be taken into account as discussed previously in ref. [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation