2010
DOI: 10.1021/es101675a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-uraninite Products of Microbial U(VI) Reduction

Abstract: A promising remediation approach to mitigate subsurface uranium contamination is the stimulation of indigenous bacteria to reduce mobile U(VI) to sparingly soluble U(IV). The product of microbial uranium reduction is often reported as the mineral uraninite. Here, we show that the end products of uranium reduction by several environmentally relevant bacteria (Gram-positive and Gram-negative) and their spores include a variety of U(IV) species other than uraninite. U(IV) products were prepared in chemically vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
287
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(317 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
26
287
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With only FeS (Figure 3), a peak concentration for dissolved Fe(II) of ∼60 μM was rapidly established after ∼5 τ, which then continuously decreased until complete FeS oxidation. This background Fe(II) profile agreed with previous studies at pH 7,23 showing a loss of ∼18% of total Fe(II) to the effluent. In the presence of noncrystalline U(IV), however, dissolved Fe(II) remained at a high concentration (∼60 μM) for an additional ∼30 τ after the peak at ∼6 τ in 10.8 mM DIC solution.…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologysupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With only FeS (Figure 3), a peak concentration for dissolved Fe(II) of ∼60 μM was rapidly established after ∼5 τ, which then continuously decreased until complete FeS oxidation. This background Fe(II) profile agreed with previous studies at pH 7,23 showing a loss of ∼18% of total Fe(II) to the effluent. In the presence of noncrystalline U(IV), however, dissolved Fe(II) remained at a high concentration (∼60 μM) for an additional ∼30 τ after the peak at ∼6 τ in 10.8 mM DIC solution.…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The final product was freeze-dried under a vacuum and stored in capped glass vials inside the anaerobic chamber until use. The resulting mackinawite was characterized as nanocrystalline particles with mineralogical description as detailed in Jeong et al 28 Biomass-associated noncrystalline U(IV) was produced as previously described in Bernier-Latmani et al 7 Briefly, Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 cultures were grown anaerobically in sterile Luria−Bertani (LB) medium and harvested when they reached mid-exponential phase. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8000 g for 10 min and washed in simple BP medium, composed of 30 mM NaHCO 3 and 20 mM 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid (PIPES buffer) adjusted to pH 6.8.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Mackinawite and Noncrystalline U(iv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P coordination and the generalized periplasmic mineralization observed in the PilA − mutant cells suggest that U(VI) permeated deep and fast into the cell envelope, where it formed carboxyl and phosphoryl-coordinated complexes with periplasmic proteins and the peptidoglycan layer (30,31) and membrane phospholipids (33), respectively. The formation of a mononuclear U(IV) phase has also been reported for other bacteria of relevance to U bioremediation (34,35), yet contrasts with earlier reports of uraninite formation by Geobacter spp. (10,36).…”
Section: Discussion Physiological Relevance Of the Extracellular Reducontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…We used a bicarbonate buffer and conditions used in previous studies with G. sulfurreducens (13), whereas studies reporting uraninite formation used PIPES-buffered solutions (36) or bicarbonatebuffered uncontaminated groundwater (10). Evidence for the microbial reduction of U(VI) to nonuraninite U(IV) products is also emerging from field-scale studies (35,37), whereas uraninite formation has been linked to conditions of reduced bioreducing activities (38,39); this suggests that abiotic factors may contribute to the formation of uraninite.…”
Section: Discussion Physiological Relevance Of the Extracellular Redumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this material contained a small fraction of monomeric U(IV) complexes associated with the biomass. 13 A uraninite slurry (either with biomass (P103-BIOMASS-slurry, B02-BIOMASS-slurry) or without biomass (P103-CLN-slurry, B02-CLN-slurry)) was placed directly into a sample tube for deployment, used to create a UO 2 -doped gel puck for mass balance determination (described below), or archived for characterization and dissolution rate measurements. The biomass associated with the uraninite was not expected to grow under deployment conditions due to the absence of electron donor.…”
Section: ' Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%