Construction Research Congress 2018 2018
DOI: 10.1061/9780784481271.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-USA Professionals’ Perception of Key BIM Maturity Indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The KMO = 0.392 is less than 0.500, we know that the Bartlett test of sphericity is used to test whether the correlation matrix is a unit matrix, that is, to test whether each test variable is independent. From the factor analysis results, we found that χ 2 = 63.862, df = 36, p = 0.003, rejecting the null hypothesis, refer to the criteria for factor analysis of Chen and Lin (2018), indicating that factor analysis can be done. Due to the conflicting and contradictory results of KMO and Bartlett test of sphericity, we follow the practice of Chen and Lin (2018), instead of extracting common factors according to the principle that the eigenvalue is greater than 1, we use all test variables as the calculation of the values of the BIM implementation principal component eigenvector values for all associated.Process of factor analysis.…”
Section: Empirical Design and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The KMO = 0.392 is less than 0.500, we know that the Bartlett test of sphericity is used to test whether the correlation matrix is a unit matrix, that is, to test whether each test variable is independent. From the factor analysis results, we found that χ 2 = 63.862, df = 36, p = 0.003, rejecting the null hypothesis, refer to the criteria for factor analysis of Chen and Lin (2018), indicating that factor analysis can be done. Due to the conflicting and contradictory results of KMO and Bartlett test of sphericity, we follow the practice of Chen and Lin (2018), instead of extracting common factors according to the principle that the eigenvalue is greater than 1, we use all test variables as the calculation of the values of the BIM implementation principal component eigenvector values for all associated.Process of factor analysis.…”
Section: Empirical Design and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…From the factor analysis results, we found that χ 2 = 63.862, df = 36, p = 0.003, rejecting the null hypothesis, refer to the criteria for factor analysis of Chen and Lin (2018), indicating that factor analysis can be done. Due to the conflicting and contradictory results of KMO and Bartlett test of sphericity, we follow the practice of Chen and Lin (2018), instead of extracting common factors according to the principle that the eigenvalue is greater than 1, we use all test variables as the calculation of the values of the BIM implementation principal component eigenvector values for all associated.Process of factor analysis. Based on the results obtained by the suitability assessment, we adjusted the starting eigenvalues obtained by factor analysis, using the nine factors of the barriers of BIM implementation, whose cumulative contribution rate reached 100% (as shown in Table 11).…”
Section: Empirical Design and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although it is a persistent problem on the overruns of budget and schedule according to many reports and research into megaproject delivery, there are various causes of the overrun problem among individual megaprojects, and the correlation of overruns between budget and schedule is always evidential. According to the two case studies on the SCL project in Hong Kong, and the BER project in Germany, it is not identical regarding the adoption of BIM systems can work well to confront the overrun problem, as the SCL project has also encountered the problem of overruns (Chan, 2018) in relation to extreme engineering challenges such as the movement and uneven settlement of the ground in the process of carrying out this largescale underground works (The Legislative Council Commission [LCC], 2018). In comparison with the BER project in Germany, the five lessons summarized above are also relevant to the SCL project in Hong Kong with regard to the need for a set of comprehensive data and information to be features into BIM systems at an early stage of megaproject delivery.…”
Section: Bim and The Overruns Of Budget And Schedulementioning
confidence: 99%