2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-vascular interventional radiology in the paediatric alimentary tract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four children in this study required a gastrostomy to be formed as part of the drainage procedure. Complications of gastrostomy formation by interventional radiology are reported to be 0–5% including peritonitis in up to 3% of cases, other infective complications such as subcutaneous abscess in 2% and septicaemia in 1%, and bowel transgression in 0.2% of cases [22]. Insufflation of air to facilitate stomach puncture can obscure subsequent pseudocyst visualisation by US and should be avoided if possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four children in this study required a gastrostomy to be formed as part of the drainage procedure. Complications of gastrostomy formation by interventional radiology are reported to be 0–5% including peritonitis in up to 3% of cases, other infective complications such as subcutaneous abscess in 2% and septicaemia in 1%, and bowel transgression in 0.2% of cases [22]. Insufflation of air to facilitate stomach puncture can obscure subsequent pseudocyst visualisation by US and should be avoided if possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For recurrent recalcitrant strictures, such as may be seen with corrosive strictures, high pressure balloons or cutting balloons may be used. 4,8 Alternatively, mitomycin C application has been used with mixed results to treat resistant strictures. Mitomycin C is an antitumor antibiotic that also inhibits fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis thus reducing scar formation.…”
Section: Esophageal Dilatationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secure nature of the antegrade gastrostomy retention disc and avoidance of gastropexy sutures are often mentioned; however, the infection rate and overall major complication rate may also be lower. 28 The rates of major complications, tube dislodgement, and peritonitis have been reported as 3.1, 3.6, and 1%, respectively, for antegrade gastrostomies compared with 5, 37, and 3%, respectively, for retrograde tubes. 17,29 Disadvantages include buried bumper syndrome, sedation requirements for tube replacement, and a 2.3% rate of retention disc migration including transmural and intracolonic locations.…”
Section: Comparison Of Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%