2022
DOI: 10.17645/pag.v10i2.5015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-War Activities in Cyberspace as a Factor Driving the Process of De-Bordering

Abstract: Whereas war is the continuation of politics by other means, a new space between diplomacy and open conflict is now becoming available for state and non-state actors, tempting them with the promise of achieving a strategic advantage over an opponent without risking the escalation of the conflict to the level of kinetic aggression. From that perspective, the ongoing shift of states and societies into cyberspace is becoming extremely interesting. As it blurs national borders, it offers an excellent dimension in w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But today they increasingly unfold in the de-territorialized virtual space created by information and communication technologies (ICT) and infrastructure. Dominika Dziwisz explores the changing nature of borders in cyberspace and examines the impact of non-war activities on the functions of state borders (Dziwisz, 2022). Modern technologies seem to accelerate the tendencies toward the blurring of physical borders; yet they also increase the use of those boundaries as security policy tools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But today they increasingly unfold in the de-territorialized virtual space created by information and communication technologies (ICT) and infrastructure. Dominika Dziwisz explores the changing nature of borders in cyberspace and examines the impact of non-war activities on the functions of state borders (Dziwisz, 2022). Modern technologies seem to accelerate the tendencies toward the blurring of physical borders; yet they also increase the use of those boundaries as security policy tools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%