Nonadherence in the era of severe asthma biologics and thermoplasty

Abstract

Nonadherence to inhaled preventers impairs asthma control. Electronic monitoring devices (EMDs) can objectively measure adherence. Their use has not been reported in difficult asthma patients potentially suitable for novel therapies, i.e. biologics and bronchial thermoplasty.Consecutive patients with difficult asthma were assessed for eligibility for novel therapies. Medication adherence, defined as taking >75% of prescribed doses, was assessed by EMD and compared with standardised clinician assessment over an 8-week period.Among 69 difficult asthma patients, adherence could not be analysed in 13, due to device incompatibility or malfunction. Nonadherence was confirmed in 20 out of 45 (44.4%) patients. Clinical assessment of nonadherence was insensitive (physician 15%, nurse 28%). Serum eosinophils were higher in nonadherent patients. Including 11 patients with possible nonadherence (device refused or not returned) increased the nonadherence rate to 31 out of 56 (55%) patients. Severe asthma criteria were fulfilled by 59 out of 69 patients. 47 were eligible for novel therapies, with confirmed nonadherence in 16 out of 32 (50%) patients with EMD data; including seven patients with possible nonadherence increased the nonadherence rate to 23 out of 39 (59%).At least half the patients eligible for novel therapies were nonadherent to preventers. Nonadherence was often undetectable by clinical assessments. Preventer adherence must be confirmed objectively before employing novel severe asthma therapies.

Severe T2-high asthma in the biologics era: European experts' opinion

“…Also highlighted was the significant proportion of patients who feel that their asthma is well controlled when in reality this is not the case, as measured by objective parameters and according to the specialists. A recent study in difficult-to-treat patients who were eligible for biologics reported non-adherence levels close to 60%, in line with previous studies [48].…”

Rational oral corticosteroid use in adult severe asthma: A narrative review

“…Asthma misdiagnosis and poor treatment adherence are relatively common, and may subject patients to unnecessary treatments including OCS . In particular, suboptimal ICS use contributes to poor asthma control, and increases the risk of exacerbations necessitating OCS use or hospitalization .…”

Health‐related quality of life burden in severe asthma

“…Treatment adherence is an important and probably misunderstood behaviour in severe asthma 14 . Despite the frequency of symptoms and the known risk of severe attacks, suboptimal adherence is common in this population, with reported prevalence of suboptimal adherence of 44% in one cohort with severe asthma 15 . Qualitative studies give some insight into this behaviour in severe asthma and the impact of treatment on quality of life.…”