2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4936864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonadiabatic dynamics with intersystem crossings: A time-dependent density functional theory implementation

Abstract: In this work, we derive a method to perform trajectory-based nonadiabatic dynamics that is able to describe both nonadiabatic transitions and intersystem crossing events (transitions between states of different spin-multiplicity) at the same level of theory, namely, time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT). To this end, we combined our previously developed TDDFT-based trajectory surface hopping scheme with an accurate and efficient algorithm for the calculation of the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) matrix e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
99
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…168 For this reason, in the last few years, the incorporation of SOC into NA-MQC schemes to simulate intersystem crossing (ISC) dynamics has become an active area of research. 129,[169][170][171][172][173][174] In NA-MQC, SOC is usually included by considering the coupling term Granucci and Persico have shown, however, that the spin-diabatic representation poses some severe challenges to control the SOC phases during the dynamics, which usually results in wrong hopping probabilities. 172 In contrast, these problems are not present if dynamics is propagated in a spin-adiabatic (sa) representation ( Fig.…”
Section: Intersystem Crossingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…168 For this reason, in the last few years, the incorporation of SOC into NA-MQC schemes to simulate intersystem crossing (ISC) dynamics has become an active area of research. 129,[169][170][171][172][173][174] In NA-MQC, SOC is usually included by considering the coupling term Granucci and Persico have shown, however, that the spin-diabatic representation poses some severe challenges to control the SOC phases during the dynamics, which usually results in wrong hopping probabilities. 172 In contrast, these problems are not present if dynamics is propagated in a spin-adiabatic (sa) representation ( Fig.…”
Section: Intersystem Crossingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigations in this field worked the spin-diabatic (sd) representation, where the electronic wavefunctions are spin-eigenstates 115,171,173,[175][176][177]. (This spin-diabatic representation is simply the conventional adiabatic representation commonly used in quantum chemistry; seeFig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,40 , while those using approximate CI-like wave functions, either based on Casida's 41 or Sternheimer's 42,43 formalism, are discussed in Refs. [44][45][46] . In the framework of the X2C Hamiltonian, spin-adapted TDDFT has been combined with a perturbational SOC treatment to evaluate the fine-structure splittings of excited states of open-shell systems 47 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the single-reference electronic structure methods, so far only time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) has been applied for ISC-focused dynamics simulations. 34,51 Although here computational efficiency and dynamical correlation are in principle given, in TDDFT the choice of the appropriate exchange-correlation functional can strongly affect the quality of the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%