1985
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.32.2166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonadiabatic sliding model for rearrangement collisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measurement was made at a scattering angle of eP = 30 * 2" in the laboratory and includes capture from and to all shells. Figure 18 contains the experimental results together with a SPB calculation by Jakubassa-Amundsen (1984a, b, 1985) (see also Jakubassa-Amundsen 1985, Jakubassa-Amundsen andAmundsen 1985). The latter includes only capture to the H ground state, but from both Ne K and L shells; the capture to higher hydrogen states is expected to change the absolute values by 10-20%, but not the energy dependence across the resonance.…”
Section: Broadening Of the Elastic Proton Scattering Resonance L3n(15...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measurement was made at a scattering angle of eP = 30 * 2" in the laboratory and includes capture from and to all shells. Figure 18 contains the experimental results together with a SPB calculation by Jakubassa-Amundsen (1984a, b, 1985) (see also Jakubassa-Amundsen 1985, Jakubassa-Amundsen andAmundsen 1985). The latter includes only capture to the H ground state, but from both Ne K and L shells; the capture to higher hydrogen states is expected to change the absolute values by 10-20%, but not the energy dependence across the resonance.…”
Section: Broadening Of the Elastic Proton Scattering Resonance L3n(15...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…below the Coulomb barrier), the collision happens adiabatically enough that molecular orbitals can be established, at least by the fast moving inner-shell electrons (Fano and Lichten 1965), and a molecular basis will be more appropriate (see below). A hybrid approach uses in this case atomic wavefunctions located at an 'effective united atom' centre somewhere on the axis between projectile and target nucleus, with an R-dependent 'effective united atom charge' Lerf (Briggs 1975, Andersen et a1 1976b, Amundsen 1978b, Jakubassa 1978, Kleber and Unterseer 1979, Anholt 1980, Jakubassa-Amundsen 1985. Effective origin and effective charge are usually determined variationally by minimising the K-shell binding energy for every nuclear distance R. Most recently a combination of moving atomic states at large internuclear distances and molecular orbitals at close distances has also been tested (Kimura and Lin 1985a, b) with good success in both symmetric and asymmetric light systems (2, + 2, < 10).…”
Section: Examples For Possible Choices Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an indication that an atomic theory like the impulse approximation or the inverse photoeffect fails for photon energies far off the peak where high momentum transfers to the active electron are required. Indeed, the influence of molecular effects which are calculated from the variational sliding center model 97 lead, even for high velocities, to an increase of the cross section in the tails of the REC peak.…”
Section: Capture Into Bound Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%