2015
DOI: 10.2514/1.j053155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonadiabatic Surface Effects on Transition Measurements Using Temperature-Sensitive Paints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, this lower temperature remains approximately constant during the actual run for some 10ths of 1 s, whereas the model temperature drifts just slightly from its prerun values. When the prerun model temperature and the charge temperature of the gas are approximately the same, this leads to a temperature difference between flow and the model surface during a run [24,26,30]. In this case, called in the following the "standard DNW-KRG thermal condition at the model surface," the ratio between the model surface temperature and the adiabatic-wall temperature T w ∕T aw is significantly larger than one.…”
Section: Cryogenic Ludwieg-tube Göttingenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subsequently, this lower temperature remains approximately constant during the actual run for some 10ths of 1 s, whereas the model temperature drifts just slightly from its prerun values. When the prerun model temperature and the charge temperature of the gas are approximately the same, this leads to a temperature difference between flow and the model surface during a run [24,26,30]. In this case, called in the following the "standard DNW-KRG thermal condition at the model surface," the ratio between the model surface temperature and the adiabatic-wall temperature T w ∕T aw is significantly larger than one.…”
Section: Cryogenic Ludwieg-tube Göttingenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At subsonic Mach numbers, the axial pressure gradient was moderately favorable in the wind-tunnel tests and essentially zero in the flight tests, with this difference being due to the influence of the fuselage in the flight tests. In [24], an NLF airfoil was experimentally investigated at both low and high subsonic Mach numbers for varying angles of attack. The results showed that the impact of a nonadiabatic wall on boundary layer transition depended on the boundary layer stability situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heat flux between the surface and flow is different for laminar and turbulent flows. As mentioned, in low Re flows, LSB forms due to the laminar flow separation and turbulent flow reattachment therefore detecting these areas utilizing IT allows the opportunity of detecting LSB characteristics on the surface of the airfoil [8]. A useful study related to separation detection using IT was reported [9] where the flow about a cylinder was studied and also investigated the separated flow area in deep stall condition over an airfoil using thermographic imaging, and temperature fluctuation to detect the separated flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies by Constantini et al [29,30] have shown that care must be taken when interpreting transition results obtained using TSP and applying a temperature step. Their work has shown that when the surface temperature (T w ) is greater than the adiabatic–wall temperature (T aw ), then the transition location can vary depending on the T w /T aw ratio.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their work has shown that when the surface temperature (T w ) is greater than the adiabatic–wall temperature (T aw ), then the transition location can vary depending on the T w /T aw ratio. To see if the application of different voltages to the CNT layer can cause a change in the transition position, an analysis of the transition location was carried out for each case using a similar procedure outlined by Constantini et al [29] and the results are shown in Figure 9. For this work, the transition position when 50 V was applied was difficult to visualize accurately.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%