2011
DOI: 10.1162/jcws_a_00072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonalignment as Yugoslavia's Answer to Bloc Politics

Abstract: 1. For archival materials that were originally in English, I have kept the spellings as presented, without adding diacritical marks to names of people or places. Otherwise, throughout the text, the English translations from Bosnian, Croatian, and Serbian are my own. I have tried at all times to be as precise and deliberate as possible. To that end, I have attempted to follow stylistic conventions, but, because sources sometimes paint only a partial picture, an occasional actor lacks a complete name or an appro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Today, new archival material from the former USSR suggests that the traditional view of the 1948 Tito-Stalin split should perhaps be revised. Declassified documents suggest that realpolitik preceded and decided the alleged ideological split with Moscow, not vice versa (Kramer, 2009;Niebuhr, 2011;Perovic, 2007;Plestina, 1992, p. 131). Perovic re-traces the West European interpretation of the Stalin-Tito split to a number of official Yugoslav historians (2007, footnote 7).…”
Section: Cold War Isomorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, new archival material from the former USSR suggests that the traditional view of the 1948 Tito-Stalin split should perhaps be revised. Declassified documents suggest that realpolitik preceded and decided the alleged ideological split with Moscow, not vice versa (Kramer, 2009;Niebuhr, 2011;Perovic, 2007;Plestina, 1992, p. 131). Perovic re-traces the West European interpretation of the Stalin-Tito split to a number of official Yugoslav historians (2007, footnote 7).…”
Section: Cold War Isomorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the Soviet Union failed to prevent Tito from taking on a leading role in the Non-Aligned Movement during the turbulent 1960s, divisions within the communist world were deepened. Tito's actions and the formation of the Non-Aligned Movement as a global power already disrupted the Soviet monopoly over communist ideology, which had been dramatically weakened by Stalin's death in 1953 and the subsequent split between the Soviet Union and China (Niebuhr, 2011). The American Embassy in Belgrade analysed the First Conference of Non-Aligned Countries, which was held in Belgrade in 1961 and recorded that the presence of a large number of prominent persons had a very exciting impact on the population, which greeted the delegates whenever they appeared on the streets, and this happened up to four times a day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-alignment thus helped to legitimise single-party rule at home and incorporate disparate internal interest groups. 8 In fact, Yugoslavia's non-aligned status in the Cold War became constitutionally enshrined in 1974. 9 Non-alignment therefore afforded Yugoslavia's different republics space to pursue constitutionally sanctioned diverging paths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%