2012
DOI: 10.1097/meg.0b013e328353fcbc
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonanesthesiologist-administered propofol sedation for colonoscopy is safe and effective

Abstract: Colonoscopy under endoscopist-controlled propofol sedation in low-risk patients is safe and effective, allowing for a complete exploration, although patients at least 65 years old and/or classified as ASA II are more likely to present a decrease in blood pressure and have a prolonged recovery time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,6 Several reports worldwide stated that EDP is a safe procedure. 15,19,20,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Nevertheless, some National Societies of Anaesthesiology have officially and publicly dissociated themselves from the NAAP guidelines, 16 and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have issued a clarification statement of an interpretive guideline that shut down the practice of EDP sedation in most hospitals in the United States. 18 These policies were pursued without any supporting evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,6 Several reports worldwide stated that EDP is a safe procedure. 15,19,20,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Nevertheless, some National Societies of Anaesthesiology have officially and publicly dissociated themselves from the NAAP guidelines, 16 and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services have issued a clarification statement of an interpretive guideline that shut down the practice of EDP sedation in most hospitals in the United States. 18 These policies were pursued without any supporting evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propofol was administered as the sole sedative agent under the supervision of two senior gastroenterologists (JMI and AJL), with expertise on nonanesthesiologist propofol administration . An initial bolus of 20–40 mg of propofol (Generic product 10 mg/ml, Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) was administered intravenously in all patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the extensive use of propofol, caution should be taken when administrated by non-anesthetists as there is no antagonist and there is also a potential to induce general anesthesia. Although, its safety in the hands of trained endoscopists has been demonstrated in numerous studies (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%