Mechanics of Flow-Induced Sound and Vibration, Volume 2 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809274-3.00005-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncavitating Lifting Sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 170 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total comparison of the sound pressure levels of all airfoils of the present study at a geometrical angle of attack of 4 • and all flow speeds is given in Figure 13. Thereby, the sound pressure level is scaled with the fifth power of the Mach number, following common trailing edge noise theory [31], and displayed as a function of the chord based Strouhal number Sr = f c • b/U. Basically, it can be seen that some airfoils lead to a noise reduction especially at low and medium Strouhal numbers, while several airfoils also lead to a noise increase at high Strouhal numbers, which is due to a contribution of surface roughness noise [4,5,22].…”
Section: Acoustic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total comparison of the sound pressure levels of all airfoils of the present study at a geometrical angle of attack of 4 • and all flow speeds is given in Figure 13. Thereby, the sound pressure level is scaled with the fifth power of the Mach number, following common trailing edge noise theory [31], and displayed as a function of the chord based Strouhal number Sr = f c • b/U. Basically, it can be seen that some airfoils lead to a noise reduction especially at low and medium Strouhal numbers, while several airfoils also lead to a noise increase at high Strouhal numbers, which is due to a contribution of surface roughness noise [4,5,22].…”
Section: Acoustic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the energy is transferred to the larger-scale vortices (lower frequency), while the smaller-scale vortices diminish in this process. In § 2.2, we presented a series of theoretical 3D AAF models of thin aerofoils (Filotas 1969a,b;Graham 1970Graham , 1971Mugridge 1970Mugridge , 1971Blake 1986). It is not convenient to compare the measured 3D AAF with the theoretical results directly, so we validate our proposed theory by comparing the 1D AAF obtained by the measured 3D AAF, defined as in (2.26), with those obtained by empirical 3D AAF models.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cases in which neither the aerofoil span nor the spanwise wavelength of the incident turbulence is effectively infinite with respect to the chord (Blake 1986), a variety of attempts have been made to find a proper aerodynamic transfer function to describe the pressure distribution on the aerofoil. Reissner & Stevens (1947a,b) introduced a correction factor to the basic function of the two-dimensional theory to study the effect of three-dimensionality of the flow and gave the corresponding methods for the numerical evaluation of the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The theoretical results closely followed those obtained by an experimental campaign. However, Blake 6 later contested that the orifice plates employed in Jenvey’s work had too small of a hole-to-pipe diameter ratio, therefore favoring the quadrupole source linked to turbulence proper over the dipole source due to the interaction with the solid surfaces. This last observation may be of particular importance for the case of subsonic flows, as demonstrated by Nelson and Morfey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%