2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.03.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonclinical factors associated with primary care physicians’ ordering patterns of magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography for headache1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1421 Additionally, there is unexplained variation in care between different hospital types. 22,23 An evaluation of practice variation provides opportunities for optimizing resource utilization and quality improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1421 Additionally, there is unexplained variation in care between different hospital types. 22,23 An evaluation of practice variation provides opportunities for optimizing resource utilization and quality improvement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Less access to the healthcare system coupled with decreased imaging among the uninsured may contribute to the lower rates of treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysm among racial/ethnic minorities and lower income patients in the United States.…”
Section: December 2012mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 The context in which the decision is made also plays an important part. In primary care, GPs experience difficulty in diagnosing headaches, 6 while in secondary care, patients will often anticipate the exclusion of secondary pathology and consultants will be under pressure to make a diagnosis at the first appointment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%