2020
DOI: 10.1007/s43441-019-00091-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonclinical Immunotoxicity Testing in the Pharmaceutical World: The Past, Present, and Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, there can even be separate NOAELs: one based on an interpretation that the ADA finding is adverse to the monkey, and another acknowledging that immunogenicity is an expected consequence in nonhuman primates and therefore may be deemed "non-adverse" with respect to assessing risk in humans. 8 Thus, for some companies, immune complex disease is not included within the NOAEL assignment but instead is categorized as adverse in animals specifically, but not relevant for evaluating human outcomes. In such cases, predictions of human risk are built around an integrated safety assessment that is not focused mainly on an NOAEL derived from nonclinical toxicity testing.…”
Section: Setting An Noael-examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there can even be separate NOAELs: one based on an interpretation that the ADA finding is adverse to the monkey, and another acknowledging that immunogenicity is an expected consequence in nonhuman primates and therefore may be deemed "non-adverse" with respect to assessing risk in humans. 8 Thus, for some companies, immune complex disease is not included within the NOAEL assignment but instead is categorized as adverse in animals specifically, but not relevant for evaluating human outcomes. In such cases, predictions of human risk are built around an integrated safety assessment that is not focused mainly on an NOAEL derived from nonclinical toxicity testing.…”
Section: Setting An Noael-examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%