“…It also played an essential role in development of genome theory, a genomic theory of inheritance and evolution [ 1 , 2 , 3 ] ( Box 1 ). There are many reasons why the importance of chromosomal instability becomes obvious within the current gene-centric world of molecular research: (1) chromosomal changes are overwhelmingly associated with cancers (both within the process of cancer evolution and as the end products) [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]; (2) karyotype coding, the spatial and topological coding of genes’ addresses within the nucleus, providing the physical platform of gene interaction networks, represents a new type of system inheritance which differs from gene-coded “parts inheritance” (thus it is the formation of a new karyotype that leads to the emergence of new genome systems) [ 8 , 9 ]; (3) macro-cellular evolution is driven by genome re-organization, while micro-cellular evolution is driven by gene mutation and/or epigenetic function [ 10 , 11 ]; (4) many previously characterized functions of cancer genes are in fact dependent on chromosomal instability or should be re-examined for the ignored involvement of CIN [ 12 , 13 ]; and (5) chromosomal instability can function as an effective biomarker with predictive and prognostic value in clinics, exceeding that of sequencing-based methodologies [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Perhaps one of the biggest hidden reasons for this shift is the research community’s response to the disappointing results of the gene-centric approach, which considers that cancer is a disease of gene mutations and promises to identify the few key common cancer gene mutations.…”