2018
DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncognitive Abilities and Financial Delinquency: The Role of Self‐Efficacy in Avoiding Financial Distress

Abstract: We investigate a novel determinant of financial distress, namely, individuals' self‐efficacy, or belief that their actions can influence the future. Individuals with high self‐efficacy are more likely to take precautions that mitigate adverse financial shocks. They are subsequently less likely to default on their debt and bill payments, especially after experiencing negative shocks such as job loss or illness. Thus, noncognitive abilities are an important determinant of financial fragility and subjective expec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
50
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(79 reference statements)
1
50
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Standard economic models suggest that debt repayment is a trade‐off between remaining solvent by forgoing other spending or increasing labour market participation or defaulting and facing the aforementioned negative consequences (Chatterjee, Corbae, Nakajima, & Rios‐Rull, ). However, research in a diverse range fields are finding that this not a straightforward economic trade‐off (Hodson, Dwyer, & Neilson, ; Kuhnen & Melzer, ; Xu, Beller, Roberts, & Brown, ). For example, Getter () considers whether payment delinquency is due to economic shocks or from “excessive” household spending and mounting financial stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Standard economic models suggest that debt repayment is a trade‐off between remaining solvent by forgoing other spending or increasing labour market participation or defaulting and facing the aforementioned negative consequences (Chatterjee, Corbae, Nakajima, & Rios‐Rull, ). However, research in a diverse range fields are finding that this not a straightforward economic trade‐off (Hodson, Dwyer, & Neilson, ; Kuhnen & Melzer, ; Xu, Beller, Roberts, & Brown, ). For example, Getter () considers whether payment delinquency is due to economic shocks or from “excessive” household spending and mounting financial stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research exploring payment delinquency has focused on economic determinants such as income shocks (Elul, Souleles, Chomsisengphet, Glennon, & Hunt, ; Getter, ; Keys, ); social determinants such as socioeconomic status, education and gender (Hodson et al, ; Oksanen, Aaltonen, & Rantala, ); structural issues such as insolvency laws (Fay, Hurst, & White, ); and more recently behavioural factors such as personality traits and self‐efficacy (Kuhnen & Melzer, ; Peijnenburg & Parise, in press; Xu et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, we add to a large and established literature which analyzes the link between financial literacy and household financial decision making. One aspect of this literature initially focused on financial aptitude or cognitive skills in financial decision making (e.g., Grinblatt, Keloharju, and Linnainmaa, 2011; or see Lusardi and Mitchell, 2014 for a recent review of the literature), while another has examined the link between non-cognitive skills and behavior and financial distress, debt-behavior, and poor financial decision making (Thaler and Shefrin, 1981;Heidhues and Kőszegi, 2010;Kuhnen and Melzer, 2018;Parise and Peijnenburg, 2018;Kuchler and Pagel, 2019). Our results contribute to this stream of the literature by showing the relative contribution of knowledge on financial topics and non-cognitive skills such as self-control on financial behavior in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For recent reviews of the literature on financial literacy and education seeLusardi and Mitchell (2014) andFernandes, Lynch, and Netemeyer (2014) 4. For example,Americks and Leahy (2003),Americks et al (2007),Meier and Sprenger (2010),Gathergood (2011),Kuhnen and Melzer (2018), andParise and Peijnenburg (2018).Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3469571…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%