Noncognitive Skills, Occupational Attainment, and Relative Wages

Abstract

This paper examines whether men's and women's noncognitive skills influence their occupational attainment and, if so, whether this contributes to the disparity in their relative wages. We find that noncognitive skills have a substantial effect on the probability of employment in many, though not all, occupations in ways that differ by gender. Consequently, men and women with similar noncognitive skills enter occupations at very different rates.Women, however, have lower wages on average not because they work in different occupations than men do, but rather because they earn less than their male colleagues employed in the same occupation. On balance, women's noncognitive skills give them a slight wage advantage. Finally, we find that accounting for the endogeneity of occupational attainment more than halves the proportion of the overall gender wage gap that is unexplained.

Does Personality Matter? Noncognitive Skills and the Male Migrant Wage Gap in Germany

“…Third, Cobb-Clark and Tan (2011) point to occupational sorting due to noncognitive skills, as do Bonin et al (2007) for risk preference. Therefore, we re-estimate Table 3 and additionally control for the one-digit German occupation classification.…”

“…Accordingly, wages depend on the nature, magnitude, and returns of these skills. Likewise, noncognitive skills indirectly affect wages through educational (Heckman, Stixrud and Urzua 2006; Lundberg 2013 b ; Peter and Storck 2015) or occupational sorting (Cobb-Clark and Tan 2011), wage bargaining (Mueller and Plug 2006), or employer learning, where employers initially determine wages based on observable characteristics and learn about true productivity over time (Altonji and Pierret 2001; Petre 2014).…”

The power of love: A subtle driving force for unegalitarian labor division?

“…This is important to highlight for two reasons: (1) The lack of significance in personality and attitude measures is very relevant in supporting the claim that females in the treatment group who played with their partners do not form a special selection. ( 2) Personality trait measures have recently gained in popularity for explaining (gender) differences labor market outcomes (see for example Groves, 2005;Borghans et al, 2008;Cobb-Clark and Tan, 2011).…”

Personality and Major Choice: The Psychology Behind Choosing a Major

“…However, the role that personality and person-environment fit play in major choice remains underexplored. Personality is related to behavior (Almlund, Duckworth, Heckman, & Kautz, 2011), vocational choice (Cobb-Clark & Tan, 2011), preferences and tastes, and likes and dislikes. Scholars have connected student typologies or personality types to college outcomes (Astin, 1977;Hu & McCormick, 2012) and time-use (Brint & Cantwell, 2010;Author, 2018;Quadlin & Rudel, 2015).…”