2018
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2018.2864981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncoherent Detection for Physical-Layer Network Coding

Abstract: This paper investigates noncoherent detection in a two-way relay channel operated with physical layer network coding (PNC), assuming FSK modulation and short-packet transmissions. For noncoherent detection, the detector has access to the magnitude but not the phase of the received signal. For conventional communication in which a receiver receives the signal from a transmitter only, the phase does not affect the magnitude, hence the performance of the noncoherent detector is independent of the phase. PNC, on t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e proposed method is compared with other DoS attack detection methods. From Table 3, we can see that the detection performance of this method is very close to that of the rank-dependent DDoS detection method [21] and parameter-dependent frequency-domain LDoS attack detection method [38]. By comparing this method with the normalized cumulative amplitude spectral density method (NCAS) [16], the detection rate of the coherent detection method used in this paper increases by about 5% and the detection error rate increases by about 2%.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…e proposed method is compared with other DoS attack detection methods. From Table 3, we can see that the detection performance of this method is very close to that of the rank-dependent DDoS detection method [21] and parameter-dependent frequency-domain LDoS attack detection method [38]. By comparing this method with the normalized cumulative amplitude spectral density method (NCAS) [16], the detection rate of the coherent detection method used in this paper increases by about 5% and the detection error rate increases by about 2%.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…There have been prior investigations on FSK-PNC detection. Specifically, [24] studied coherent detection and [25] [26] [27] [28] studied noncoherent detection. A coherent detector has access to the magnitude and the phase of the received signals, whereas a noncoherent detector only has access to the magnitude of the received signals.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) comparison of the performance of the new BPCD and the noncoherent detector in [25] (both do not have knowledge of a priori channel and CFO distributions) under the same set-up. In particular, we assume in the set-up that the CFO could fully characterize the symbol-to-symbol relative phase rotation between the local oscillators of user u and relay R.…”
Section: Detector Design Without Prior Distributions Of Channel Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…around the robot. In the most of current PNC studies, the uplink of PNC requires that the robot and controller transmit the same length of information even in the case where the channel power between the controller and relay is stronger than that between the robot and relay [8]- [10]. In this case, the controller should find another time slot to transmit the rest of information separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%